PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDW0.DE vs. LCUJ.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDW0.DE vs. LCUJ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDW0.DE) and Amundi MSCI Japan UCITS ETF Acc (LCUJ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDW0.DE achieves a 28.70% return, which is significantly higher than LCUJ.DE's 18.85% return.


XDW0.DE

1D
-0.93%
1M
2.25%
6M
19.90%
YTD
28.70%
1Y
34.95%
3Y*
15.05%
5Y*
20.85%
10Y*
8.15%

LCUJ.DE

1D
-1.05%
1M
0.85%
6M
12.81%
YTD
18.85%
1Y
38.30%
3Y*
17.29%
5Y*
10.28%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDW0.DE vs. LCUJ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
XDW0.DE
Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C
28.70%2.24%7.48%0.19%53.95%52.21%-36.99%14.05%-6.30%
LCUJ.DE
Amundi MSCI Japan UCITS ETF Acc
18.85%12.72%13.58%16.52%-12.47%10.03%5.07%22.41%-99.31%

Correlation

The correlation between XDW0.DE and LCUJ.DE is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2018

0.32

The correlation between XDW0.DE and LCUJ.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (1 year) to 0.32 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDW0.DE vs. LCUJ.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDW0.DE
XDW0.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
XDW0.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDW0.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDW0.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
XDW0.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDW0.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

LCUJ.DE
LCUJ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
LCUJ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LCUJ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
LCUJ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
LCUJ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
LCUJ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDW0.DE vs. LCUJ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDW0.DE) and Amundi MSCI Japan UCITS ETF Acc (LCUJ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XDW0.DELCUJ.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.35

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.24

3.79

-1.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.78

12.01

-6.23

XDW0.DE vs. LCUJ.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDW0.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is comparable to the LCUJ.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDW0.DE and LCUJ.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XDW0.DE vs. LCUJ.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDW0.DE drawdown since its inception was -66.27%, smaller than the maximum LCUJ.DE drawdown of -99.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDW0.DE and LCUJ.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDW0.DELCUJ.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.27%

-99.38%

+33.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.55%

-10.06%

-5.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.70%

-16.93%

-6.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.70%

-19.11%

-4.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.20%

-98.49%

+88.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.94%

-98.36%

+75.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.03%

3.18%

+2.85%

Volatility

XDW0.DE vs. LCUJ.DE - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDW0.DE) and Amundi MSCI Japan UCITS ETF Acc (LCUJ.DE) have volatilities of 6.81% and 6.70%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDW0.DELCUJ.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.81%

6.70%

+0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.48%

16.15%

+3.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.56%

19.86%

+2.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.24%

16.87%

+7.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.60%

38.27%

-11.67%

XDW0.DE vs. LCUJ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDW0.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than LCUJ.DE's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XDW0.DE vs. LCUJ.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither XDW0.DE nor LCUJ.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XDW0.DE and LCUJ.DE have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LCUJ.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LCUJ.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XDW0.DE.

XDW0.DE is categorized as Energy Equities, while LCUJ.DE is Japan Equities. XDW0.DE tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD, while LCUJ.DE tracks MSCI Japan. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XDW0.DE and 0.12% for LCUJ.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDW0.DE and LCUJ.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer