XDW0.DE vs. IQQH.DE
XDW0.DE (Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C) and IQQH.DE (iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) are both Energy Equities funds - XDW0.DE tracks the MSCI World/Energy NR USD while IQQH.DE tracks the S&P Global Clean Energy. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XDW0.DE returned 9.20%/yr vs 11.71%/yr for IQQH.DE. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XDW0.DE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for IQQH.DE.
Performance
XDW0.DE vs. IQQH.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XDW0.DE achieves a 32.75% return, which is significantly lower than IQQH.DE's 39.28% return. Over the past 10 years, XDW0.DE has underperformed IQQH.DE with an annualized return of 9.20%, while IQQH.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 11.71% annualized return.
XDW0.DE
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- 3.29%
- YTD
- 32.75%
- 6M
- 28.86%
- 1Y
- 45.88%
- 3Y*
- 15.71%
- 5Y*
- 20.33%
- 10Y*
- 9.20%
IQQH.DE
- 1D
- -1.81%
- 1M
- 8.45%
- YTD
- 39.28%
- 6M
- 35.95%
- 1Y
- 78.04%
- 3Y*
- 5.37%
- 5Y*
- 2.58%
- 10Y*
- 11.71%
XDW0.DE vs. IQQH.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDW0.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C | 32.75% | 2.24% | 7.48% | 0.18% | 53.95% | 52.18% | -36.97% | 14.05% | -12.13% | -7.68% |
IQQH.DE iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 39.28% | 29.83% | -21.49% | -22.15% | 0.84% | -17.65% | 117.65% | 49.62% | -4.26% | 7.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDW0.DE and IQQH.DE is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2016 | 0.34 |
The correlation between XDW0.DE and IQQH.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.34 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDW0.DE vs. IQQH.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XDW0.DE
IQQH.DE
XDW0.DE vs. IQQH.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDW0.DE) and iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IQQH.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XDW0.DE | IQQH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.50 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.98 | 6.29 | -3.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.92 | 19.88 | -9.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XDW0.DE | IQQH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.10 | 3.18 | -1.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 | 0.10 | +0.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 | 0.46 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | -0.01 | +0.38 |
Drawdowns
XDW0.DE vs. IQQH.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDW0.DE drawdown since its inception was -61.44%, smaller than the maximum IQQH.DE drawdown of -86.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDW0.DE and IQQH.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDW0.DE | IQQH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.44% | -86.09% | +24.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.05% | -12.32% | -2.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.71% | -44.43% | +20.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.71% | -57.70% | +33.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -61.44% | -63.78% | +2.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.38% | -24.01% | +16.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.84% | -59.78% | +45.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.53% | 3.90% | +0.63% |
Volatility
XDW0.DE vs. IQQH.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDW0.DE) is 6.96%, while iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IQQH.DE) has a volatility of 9.79%. This indicates that XDW0.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IQQH.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDW0.DE | IQQH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.96% | 9.79% | -2.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.42% | 18.31% | +0.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.48% | 24.37% | -2.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.04% | 24.69% | -0.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.02% | 25.08% | +0.94% |
XDW0.DE vs. IQQH.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDW0.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than IQQH.DE's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
XDW0.DE vs. IQQH.DE - Dividend Comparison
XDW0.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IQQH.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IQQH.DE iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 0.94% | 1.53% | 1.32% | 1.23% | 0.83% | 1.23% | 0.56% | 2.89% | 3.30% | 4.82% | 4.72% | 2.86% |
XDW0.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XDW0.DE and IQQH.DE have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XDW0.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDW0.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for IQQH.DE.
XDW0.DE tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD, while IQQH.DE tracks S&P Global Clean Energy. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XDW0.DE and 0.65% for IQQH.DE.
Find the right allocation for XDW0.DE and IQQH.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer