XDW0.DE vs. G1CD.DE
XDW0.DE (Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C) and G1CD.DE (Invesco Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF Dist) are both Energy Equities funds - XDW0.DE tracks the MSCI World/Energy NR USD while G1CD.DE tracks the WilderHill New Energy Global Innovation. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XDW0.DE returned 15.71%/yr vs 5.13%/yr for G1CD.DE. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XDW0.DE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for G1CD.DE.
Performance
XDW0.DE vs. G1CD.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XDW0.DE achieves a 32.75% return, which is significantly lower than G1CD.DE's 35.16% return.
XDW0.DE
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- 3.29%
- YTD
- 32.75%
- 6M
- 28.86%
- 1Y
- 45.88%
- 3Y*
- 15.71%
- 5Y*
- 20.33%
- 10Y*
- 9.20%
G1CD.DE
- 1D
- -0.69%
- 1M
- 3.04%
- YTD
- 35.16%
- 6M
- 36.31%
- 1Y
- 84.42%
- 3Y*
- 5.13%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XDW0.DE vs. G1CD.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDW0.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C | 32.75% | 2.24% | 7.48% | 0.18% | 29.78% |
G1CD.DE Invesco Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF Dist | 35.16% | 28.09% | -22.10% | -13.60% | -7.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDW0.DE and G1CD.DE is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2022 | 0.25 |
The correlation between XDW0.DE and G1CD.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.25 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDW0.DE vs. G1CD.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XDW0.DE
G1CD.DE
XDW0.DE vs. G1CD.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDW0.DE) and Invesco Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF Dist (G1CD.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XDW0.DE | G1CD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.62 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.98 | 7.85 | -4.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.92 | 27.83 | -17.91 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XDW0.DE | G1CD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.10 | 3.90 | -1.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 0.07 | +0.30 |
Drawdowns
XDW0.DE vs. G1CD.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDW0.DE drawdown since its inception was -61.44%, roughly equal to the maximum G1CD.DE drawdown of -64.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDW0.DE and G1CD.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDW0.DE | G1CD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.44% | -64.00% | +2.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.05% | -10.60% | -4.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.71% | -52.73% | +29.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.71% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -61.44% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.38% | -16.50% | +9.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.84% | -35.01% | +21.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.53% | 3.00% | +1.53% |
Volatility
XDW0.DE vs. G1CD.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDW0.DE) is 6.96%, while Invesco Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF Dist (G1CD.DE) has a volatility of 8.16%. This indicates that XDW0.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than G1CD.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDW0.DE | G1CD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.96% | 8.16% | -1.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.42% | 14.33% | +4.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.48% | 21.33% | +0.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.04% | 25.12% | -1.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.02% | 25.12% | +0.90% |
XDW0.DE vs. G1CD.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDW0.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than G1CD.DE's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
XDW0.DE vs. G1CD.DE - Dividend Comparison
XDW0.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while G1CD.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
G1CD.DE Invesco Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF Dist | 1.52% | 2.08% | 1.37% | 0.70% | 0.09% |
XDW0.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XDW0.DE and G1CD.DE have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XDW0.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDW0.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for G1CD.DE.
XDW0.DE tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD, while G1CD.DE tracks WilderHill New Energy Global Innovation. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XDW0.DE and 0.60% for G1CD.DE.
Find the right allocation for XDW0.DE and G1CD.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer