PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
XDV.TO vs. FCCD.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

XDV.TO vs. FCCD.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

XDV.TO (iShares Canadian Select Dividend Index ETF) and FCCD.TO (Fidelity Canadian High Dividend Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XDV.TO is a Canada Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Canada GR CAD, while FCCD.TO is a Dividend fund tracking the Fidelity Canada Canadian High Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XDV.TO returned 13.46%/yr vs 12.03%/yr for FCCD.TO. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XDV.TO charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for FCCD.TO.

Performance

XDV.TO vs. FCCD.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares Canadian Select Dividend Index ETF (XDV.TO) and Fidelity Canadian High Dividend Index ETF (FCCD.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDV.TO achieves a 16.45% return, which is significantly higher than FCCD.TO's 14.15% return.

XDV.TO

1D
-0.09%
1M
4.74%
YTD
16.45%
6M
20.26%
1Y
39.82%
3Y*
23.34%
5Y*
13.46%
10Y*
11.99%

FCCD.TO

1D
-0.07%
1M
3.50%
YTD
14.15%
6M
15.72%
1Y
32.15%
3Y*
19.49%
5Y*
12.03%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDV.TO vs. FCCD.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
XDV.TO
iShares Canadian Select Dividend Index ETF		16.45%29.37%21.28%8.00%-8.57%31.30%-0.38%21.30%-8.95%
FCCD.TO
Fidelity Canadian High Dividend Index ETF		14.15%25.05%16.92%3.35%-4.04%29.46%-8.44%20.71%-8.21%

Correlation

The correlation between XDV.TO and FCCD.TO is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2018

0.80

The correlation between XDV.TO and FCCD.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

XDV.TO vs. FCCD.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
XDV.TO
FCCD.TO

Financial Services

51.5%
26.4%

Energy

11.8%
25.0%

Consumer Cyclical

11.5%
10.5%

Utilities

11.0%
9.5%

Communication Services

7.5%
6.2%

Industrials

3.3%
3.6%

Consumer Defensive

1.7%

-

Basic Materials

1.6%
11.9%

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

6.4%

Technology

-

0.5%

Financial Services

XDV.TO
51.5%
FCCD.TO
26.4%

Energy

XDV.TO
11.8%
FCCD.TO
25.0%

Consumer Cyclical

XDV.TO
11.5%
FCCD.TO
10.5%

Utilities

XDV.TO
11.0%
FCCD.TO
9.5%

Communication Services

XDV.TO
7.5%
FCCD.TO
6.2%

Industrials

XDV.TO
3.3%
FCCD.TO
3.6%

Consumer Defensive

XDV.TO
1.7%
FCCD.TO

-

Basic Materials

XDV.TO
1.6%
FCCD.TO
11.9%

Healthcare

XDV.TO

-

FCCD.TO

-

Real Estate

XDV.TO

-

FCCD.TO
6.4%

Technology

XDV.TO

-

FCCD.TO
0.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Canadian Select Dividend Index ETF

Fidelity Canadian High Dividend Index ETF

Often compared with XDV.TO:
XDV.TO vs. XDIV.TOXDV.TO vs. VDY.TOXDV.TO vs. XEI.TOXDV.TO vs. CDZ.TOXDV.TO vs. ZDV.TOXDV.TO vs. XIU.TOXDV.TO vs. ZSP.TO
Often compared with FCCD.TO:
FCCD.TO vs. VDY.TOFCCD.TO vs. ZDV.TOFCCD.TO vs. ZDIV.TOFCCD.TO vs. FCIL.NEOFCCD.TO vs. FCUV.TOFCCD.TO vs. IDIV-B.TOFCCD.TO vs. XDIV.TO

Return for Risk

XDV.TO vs. FCCD.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
XDV.TO
XDV.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
XDV.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDV.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDV.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
XDV.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDV.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
FCCD.TO
FCCD.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
FCCD.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCCD.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCCD.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
FCCD.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCCD.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDV.TO vs. FCCD.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Canadian Select Dividend Index ETF (XDV.TO) and Fidelity Canadian High Dividend Index ETF (FCCD.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

XDV.TOFCCD.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
5.11
3.87

+1.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
7.58
5.43

+2.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.02

1.74

+0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

8.35

5.70

+2.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

41.42

27.08

+14.34

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XDV.TO vs. FCCD.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDV.TO Sharpe Ratio is 5.11, which is higher than the FCCD.TO Sharpe Ratio of 3.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDV.TO and FCCD.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

XDV.TOFCCD.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.11

3.87

+1.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.26

1.05

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.62

-0.03

Drawdowns

XDV.TO vs. FCCD.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDV.TO drawdown since its inception was -48.56%, which is greater than FCCD.TO's maximum drawdown of -43.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDV.TO and FCCD.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

XDV.TOFCCD.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.56%

-43.53%

-5.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.79%

-5.67%

+0.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.99%

-9.94%

-3.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.52%

-19.24%

-1.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.08%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.18%

-0.44%

+0.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.78%

-6.39%

-0.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.96%

1.19%

-0.23%

Volatility

XDV.TO vs. FCCD.TO - Volatility Comparison

iShares Canadian Select Dividend Index ETF (XDV.TO) has a higher volatility of 2.79% compared to Fidelity Canadian High Dividend Index ETF (FCCD.TO) at 2.54%. This indicates that XDV.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCCD.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

XDV.TOFCCD.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.79%

2.54%

+0.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.53%

6.80%

-0.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.83%

8.37%

-0.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.71%

11.52%

-0.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.63%

17.11%

-2.48%

XDV.TO vs. FCCD.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDV.TO has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than FCCD.TO's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

XDV.TO vs. FCCD.TO - Dividend Comparison

XDV.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.36%, more than FCCD.TO's 2.97% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCCD.TO
Fidelity Canadian High Dividend Index ETF		2.97%3.56%4.27%4.65%4.01%3.02%4.74%3.80%0.47%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XDV.TO
iShares Canadian Select Dividend Index ETF		3.36%3.46%4.34%4.62%4.49%3.82%4.78%4.21%4.92%3.65%3.91%4.75%

Frequently Asked Questions

XDV.TO and FCCD.TO have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FCCD.TO is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FCCD.TO is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for XDV.TO.

XDV.TO is categorized as Canada Equities, while FCCD.TO is Dividend. XDV.TO tracks Morningstar Canada GR CAD, while FCCD.TO tracks Fidelity Canada Canadian High Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for XDV.TO and 0.35% for FCCD.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDV.TO and FCCD.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer