XDUS.L vs. MXUS.L
XDUS.L (Xtrackers MSCI USA UCITS ETF 1C) and MXUS.L (Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds tracking the Russell 1000 TR USD, from Xtrackers and Invesco respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XDUS.L returned 16.05%/yr vs 16.19%/yr for MXUS.L. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XDUS.L charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for MXUS.L.
Performance
XDUS.L vs. MXUS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XDUS.L is traded in GBp, while MXUS.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the MXUS.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with XDUS.L having a 10.50% return and MXUS.L slightly higher at 10.76%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with XDUS.L having a 16.05% annualized return and MXUS.L not far ahead at 16.19%.
XDUS.L
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 5.63%
- YTD
- 10.50%
- 6M
- 10.29%
- 1Y
- 28.78%
- 3Y*
- 19.16%
- 5Y*
- 14.56%
- 10Y*
- 16.05%
MXUS.L
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 5.55%
- YTD
- 10.76%
- 6M
- 10.22%
- 1Y
- 28.98%
- 3Y*
- 19.40%
- 5Y*
- 14.80%
- 10Y*
- 16.19%
XDUS.L vs. MXUS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDUS.L Xtrackers MSCI USA UCITS ETF 1C | 10.50% | 9.21% | 27.38% | 20.65% | -10.42% | 28.96% | 16.52% | 26.57% | -0.19% | 10.82% |
MXUS.L Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF | 10.76% | 8.98% | 27.76% | 21.45% | -10.52% | 29.11% | 17.43% | 26.02% | 0.17% | 10.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDUS.L and MXUS.L is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 3, 2014 | 0.81 |
The correlation between XDUS.L and MXUS.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.81 (all time) to 0.93 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XDUS.L vs. MXUS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XDUS.L
MXUS.L
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
XDUS.L
MXUS.L
Financial Services
XDUS.L
MXUS.L
Communication Services
XDUS.L
MXUS.L
Consumer Cyclical
XDUS.L
MXUS.L
Healthcare
XDUS.L
MXUS.L
Industrials
XDUS.L
MXUS.L
Consumer Defensive
XDUS.L
MXUS.L
Energy
XDUS.L
MXUS.L
Utilities
XDUS.L
MXUS.L
Real Estate
XDUS.L
MXUS.L
Basic Materials
XDUS.L
MXUS.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDUS.L vs. MXUS.L — Risk / Return Rank
XDUS.L
MXUS.L
XDUS.L vs. MXUS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI USA UCITS ETF 1C (XDUS.L) and Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF (MXUS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XDUS.L | MXUS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.45 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.82 | 3.80 | +0.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.55 | 12.47 | +1.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XDUS.L | MXUS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.68 | 2.42 | +0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.00 | 0.95 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.05 | 0.97 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.08 | 1.02 | +0.06 |
Drawdowns
XDUS.L vs. MXUS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDUS.L drawdown since its inception was -25.82%, roughly equal to the maximum MXUS.L drawdown of -26.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDUS.L and MXUS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDUS.L | MXUS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.82% | -26.52% | +0.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.50% | -7.59% | +0.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.51% | -21.41% | -0.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.51% | -21.41% | -0.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.82% | -26.52% | +0.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.16% | -0.09% | -0.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.60% | -3.30% | -0.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.12% | 2.32% | -0.20% |
Volatility
XDUS.L vs. MXUS.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI USA UCITS ETF 1C (XDUS.L) is 2.60%, while Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF (MXUS.L) has a volatility of 3.47%. This indicates that XDUS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MXUS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDUS.L | MXUS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.60% | 3.47% | -0.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.27% | 8.61% | -1.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.70% | 11.90% | -1.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.64% | 15.66% | -1.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.25% | 16.66% | -0.41% |
XDUS.L vs. MXUS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDUS.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than MXUS.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XDUS.L vs. MXUS.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XDUS.L nor MXUS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, XDUS.L and MXUS.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, MXUS.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MXUS.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for XDUS.L.
Both ETFs track Russell 1000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for XDUS.L and 0.05% for MXUS.L.
Find the right allocation for XDUS.L and MXUS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer