PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
XDUS.L vs. CSUS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

XDUS.L vs. CSUS.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XDUS.L (Xtrackers MSCI USA UCITS ETF 1C) and CSUS.L (iShares VII plc - iShares MSCI USA ETF USD Acc) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds tracking the Russell 1000 TR USD, from Xtrackers and iShares respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XDUS.L returned 16.05%/yr vs 16.03%/yr for CSUS.L. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XDUS.L charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for CSUS.L.

Performance

XDUS.L vs. CSUS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI USA UCITS ETF 1C (XDUS.L) and iShares VII plc - iShares MSCI USA ETF USD Acc (CSUS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XDUS.L is traded in GBp, while CSUS.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CSUS.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with XDUS.L having a 10.50% return and CSUS.L slightly higher at 10.77%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with XDUS.L having a 16.05% annualized return and CSUS.L not far behind at 16.03%.

XDUS.L

1D
0.05%
1M
5.63%
YTD
10.50%
6M
10.29%
1Y
28.78%
3Y*
19.16%
5Y*
14.56%
10Y*
16.05%

CSUS.L

1D
0.06%
1M
5.66%
YTD
10.77%
6M
10.21%
1Y
28.75%
3Y*
19.41%
5Y*
14.52%
10Y*
16.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDUS.L vs. CSUS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XDUS.L
Xtrackers MSCI USA UCITS ETF 1C		10.50%9.21%27.38%20.65%-10.42%28.96%16.52%26.57%-0.19%10.82%
CSUS.L
iShares VII plc - iShares MSCI USA ETF USD Acc		10.77%8.87%28.02%19.99%-10.92%29.54%16.77%25.42%-0.23%10.40%

Correlation

The correlation between XDUS.L and CSUS.L is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2014

0.73

The correlation between XDUS.L and CSUS.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (all time) to 0.91 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XDUS.L vs. CSUS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
XDUS.L
CSUS.L

Technology

35.4%
35.4%

Financial Services

11.6%
11.6%

Communication Services

11.3%
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
10.2%

Healthcare

8.6%
8.6%

Industrials

8.6%
8.5%

Consumer Defensive

4.8%
4.8%

Energy

3.6%
3.6%

Utilities

2.3%
2.3%

Real Estate

1.9%
1.9%

Basic Materials

1.8%
1.8%

Technology

XDUS.L
35.4%
CSUS.L
35.4%

Financial Services

XDUS.L
11.6%
CSUS.L
11.6%

Communication Services

XDUS.L
11.3%
CSUS.L
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

XDUS.L
10.1%
CSUS.L
10.2%

Healthcare

XDUS.L
8.6%
CSUS.L
8.6%

Industrials

XDUS.L
8.6%
CSUS.L
8.5%

Consumer Defensive

XDUS.L
4.8%
CSUS.L
4.8%

Energy

XDUS.L
3.6%
CSUS.L
3.6%

Utilities

XDUS.L
2.3%
CSUS.L
2.3%

Real Estate

XDUS.L
1.9%
CSUS.L
1.9%

Basic Materials

XDUS.L
1.8%
CSUS.L
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Xtrackers MSCI USA UCITS ETF 1C

iShares VII plc - iShares MSCI USA ETF USD Acc

Often compared with XDUS.L:
XDUS.L vs. EUSAXDUS.L vs. CU1.LXDUS.L vs. GPSA.LXDUS.L vs. XNAQ.LXDUS.L vs. HMUS.LXDUS.L vs. XWD1.DEXDUS.L vs. XZMD.L
Often compared with CSUS.L:
CSUS.L vs. VTICSUS.L vs. XD9D.DECSUS.L vs. SPYCSUS.L vs. AVUVCSUS.L vs. VXUSCSUS.L vs. ITOTCSUS.L vs. VOO

Return for Risk

XDUS.L vs. CSUS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
XDUS.L
XDUS.L Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
XDUS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDUS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDUS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
XDUS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDUS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
CSUS.L
CSUS.L Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
CSUS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSUS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSUS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
CSUS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSUS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDUS.L vs. CSUS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI USA UCITS ETF 1C (XDUS.L) and iShares VII plc - iShares MSCI USA ETF USD Acc (CSUS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

XDUS.LCSUS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.68
2.38

+0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.59
3.23

+0.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.44

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.82

3.73

+0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.55

12.32

+1.23

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XDUS.L vs. CSUS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDUS.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.68, which is comparable to the CSUS.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDUS.L and CSUS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

XDUS.LCSUS.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.68

2.38

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

0.98

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.05

1.03

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.08

1.21

-0.13

Drawdowns

XDUS.L vs. CSUS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDUS.L drawdown since its inception was -25.82%, roughly equal to the maximum CSUS.L drawdown of -26.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDUS.L and CSUS.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

XDUS.LCSUS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.82%

-26.52%

+0.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.50%

-7.68%

+0.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.51%

-21.55%

+0.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.51%

-21.55%

+0.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.82%

-26.52%

+0.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.16%

-0.11%

-0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.60%

-3.54%

-0.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.12%

2.33%

-0.21%

Volatility

XDUS.L vs. CSUS.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI USA UCITS ETF 1C (XDUS.L) is 2.60%, while iShares VII plc - iShares MSCI USA ETF USD Acc (CSUS.L) has a volatility of 3.51%. This indicates that XDUS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CSUS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

XDUS.LCSUS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.60%

3.51%

-0.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.27%

8.63%

-1.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.70%

12.03%

-1.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.64%

16.00%

-1.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.25%

17.22%

-0.97%

XDUS.L vs. CSUS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDUS.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than CSUS.L's 0.33% expense ratio.

Dividends

XDUS.L vs. CSUS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XDUS.L nor CSUS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

With a correlation of 0.91, XDUS.L and CSUS.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, XDUS.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDUS.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for CSUS.L.

Both ETFs track Russell 1000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for XDUS.L and 0.33% for CSUS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDUS.L and CSUS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer