CSUS.L vs. VOO
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares VII plc - iShares MSCI USA ETF USD Acc (CSUS.L) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO).
CSUS.L and VOO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CSUS.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 TR USD. It was launched on Jan 12, 2010. VOO is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on Sep 7, 2010. Both CSUS.L and VOO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CSUS.L or VOO.
Key characteristics
| CSUS.L | VOO | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 26.75% | 27.26% |
| 1Y Return | 39.60% | 37.86% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 9.40% | 10.35% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 15.62% | 16.03% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 12.83% | 13.45% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 3.15 | 3.25 |
| Sortino Ratio | 4.22 | 4.31 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.60 | 1.61 |
| Calmar Ratio | 4.49 | 4.74 |
| Martin Ratio | 20.43 | 21.63 |
| Ulcer Index | 1.88% | 1.85% |
| Daily Std Dev | 12.21% | 12.25% |
| Max Drawdown | -34.38% | -33.99% |
| Current Drawdown | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSUS.L and VOO is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
CSUS.L vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with CSUS.L having a 26.75% return and VOO slightly higher at 27.26%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CSUS.L having a 12.83% annualized return and VOO not far ahead at 13.45%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CSUS.L vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSUS.L has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CSUS.L vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares VII plc - iShares MSCI USA ETF USD Acc (CSUS.L) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CSUS.L vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
CSUS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSUS.L iShares VII plc - iShares MSCI USA ETF USD Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.23% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% | 1.85% | 1.84% |
Drawdowns
CSUS.L vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSUS.L drawdown since its inception was -34.38%, roughly equal to the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSUS.L and VOO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CSUS.L vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
iShares VII plc - iShares MSCI USA ETF USD Acc (CSUS.L) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) have volatilities of 3.74% and 3.92%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.