PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
XDUH.TO vs. FCCQ.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

XDUH.TO vs. FCCQ.TO

Last updated Aug 2, 2026
Documentation

XDUH.TO (iShares Core MSCI US Quality Dividend Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)) and FCCQ.TO (Fidelity Canadian High Quality ETF) are both Quality Factor funds - XDUH.TO tracks the Morningstar US Market TR CAD while FCCQ.TO tracks the Fidelity Canada Canadian High Quality Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XDUH.TO returned 7.12%/yr vs 13.37%/yr for FCCQ.TO. Their 0.36 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. XDUH.TO charges 0.16%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for FCCQ.TO.

Performance

XDUH.TO vs. FCCQ.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares Core MSCI US Quality Dividend Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XDUH.TO) and Fidelity Canadian High Quality ETF (FCCQ.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDUH.TO achieves a 13.00% return, which is significantly higher than FCCQ.TO's 8.28% return.

XDUH.TO

1D
0.22%
1M
0.51%
6M
7.89%
YTD
13.00%
1Y
18.77%
3Y*
10.83%
5Y*
7.12%
10Y*
—
ALL TIME*
7.75%

FCCQ.TO

1D
-0.49%
1M
0.29%
6M
8.68%
YTD
8.28%
1Y
31.29%
3Y*
21.78%
5Y*
13.37%
10Y*
—
ALL TIME*
12.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)

FCCQ.TO

Fidelity Canadian High Quality ETF
CA$101.79KCA$82.56KCA$89.46K

XDUH.TO

iShares Core MSCI US Quality Dividend Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)
CA$63.30KCA$42.57KCA$56.92K

XDUH.TO vs. FCCQ.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
XDUH.TO
iShares Core MSCI US Quality Dividend Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)		13.00%8.08%9.51%5.63%-6.27%22.61%-2.02%15.69%
FCCQ.TO
Fidelity Canadian High Quality ETF		8.28%32.22%21.60%11.04%-7.50%22.27%1.92%9.55%

Correlation

The correlation between XDUH.TO and FCCQ.TO is 0.32, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 24, 2019

0.36

The correlation between XDUH.TO and FCCQ.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (1 year) to 0.43 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XDUH.TO vs. FCCQ.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
XDUH.TO
FCCQ.TO

Healthcare

20.3%
4.0%

Industrials

14.3%
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

13.8%
5.6%

Technology

12.9%
13.5%

Energy

10.2%
10.1%

Financial Services

10.2%
25.0%

Consumer Cyclical

9.3%
4.4%

Utilities

3.7%

-

Communication Services

3.6%

-

Basic Materials

1.8%
18.2%

Real Estate

-

1.9%

Healthcare

XDUH.TO
20.3%
FCCQ.TO
4.0%

Industrials

XDUH.TO
14.3%
FCCQ.TO
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

XDUH.TO
13.8%
FCCQ.TO
5.6%

Technology

XDUH.TO
12.9%
FCCQ.TO
13.5%

Energy

XDUH.TO
10.2%
FCCQ.TO
10.1%

Financial Services

XDUH.TO
10.2%
FCCQ.TO
25.0%

Consumer Cyclical

XDUH.TO
9.3%
FCCQ.TO
4.4%

Utilities

XDUH.TO
3.7%
FCCQ.TO

-

Communication Services

XDUH.TO
3.6%
FCCQ.TO

-

Basic Materials

XDUH.TO
1.8%
FCCQ.TO
18.2%

Real Estate

XDUH.TO

-

FCCQ.TO
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Core MSCI US Quality Dividend Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)

Fidelity Canadian High Quality ETF

Often compared with XDUH.TO:
XDUH.TO vs. SCHDXDUH.TO vs. XDGH.TOXDUH.TO vs. XDU.TOXDUH.TO vs. XDIV.TOXDUH.TO vs. ZDY.TOXDUH.TO vs. XHD.TOXDUH.TO vs. XDV.TO
Often compared with FCCQ.TO:
FCCQ.TO vs. FBTC.TOFCCQ.TO vs. FXM.TOFCCQ.TO vs. FCCM.NEOFCCQ.TO vs. DMEC.TOFCCQ.TO vs. FCMO.NEOFCCQ.TO vs. XIC.TOFCCQ.TO vs. HCA.TO

Return for Risk

XDUH.TO vs. FCCQ.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.
XDUH.TO
XDUH.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
XDUH.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDUH.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDUH.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
XDUH.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDUH.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
FCCQ.TO
FCCQ.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
FCCQ.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCCQ.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCCQ.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
FCCQ.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCCQ.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XDUH.TO vs. FCCQ.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI US Quality Dividend Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XDUH.TO) and Fidelity Canadian High Quality ETF (FCCQ.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

XDUH.TOFCCQ.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.49
2.04

-0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.18
2.66

-0.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.36

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.90

2.71

+0.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.77

10.70

-2.93

XDUH.TO vs. FCCQ.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDUH.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is comparable to the FCCQ.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDUH.TO and FCCQ.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XDUH.TO vs. FCCQ.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDUH.TO drawdown since its inception was -34.91%, roughly equal to the maximum FCCQ.TO drawdown of -35.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDUH.TO and FCCQ.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

XDUH.TOFCCQ.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.91%

-35.56%

+0.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.08%

-11.29%

+5.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.35%

-13.41%

-0.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.33%

-17.96%

+0.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.41%

-1.17%

-0.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.38%

-3.98%

-0.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.27%

2.86%

-0.59%

Volatility

XDUH.TO vs. FCCQ.TO - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core MSCI US Quality Dividend Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XDUH.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.00% compared to Fidelity Canadian High Quality ETF (FCCQ.TO) at 3.60%. This indicates that XDUH.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCCQ.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

XDUH.TOFCCQ.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.00%

3.60%

+0.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.60%

11.48%

-3.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.98%

15.04%

-3.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.58%

13.79%

-0.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.41%

16.03%

+0.38%

XDUH.TO vs. FCCQ.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDUH.TO has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is lower than FCCQ.TO's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

XDUH.TO vs. FCCQ.TO - Dividend Comparison

XDUH.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.20%, more than FCCQ.TO's 1.47% yield.

PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FCCQ.TO
Fidelity Canadian High Quality ETF		1.47%1.44%1.85%2.41%2.33%1.92%2.14%2.33%0.00%0.00%
XDUH.TO
iShares Core MSCI US Quality Dividend Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)		2.20%2.46%2.67%2.55%2.40%2.62%2.67%2.36%2.75%0.76%

Frequently Asked Questions

XDUH.TO and FCCQ.TO have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XDUH.TO is cheaper at 0.16% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDUH.TO is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for FCCQ.TO.

XDUH.TO tracks Morningstar US Market TR CAD, while FCCQ.TO tracks Fidelity Canada Canadian High Quality Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.16% for XDUH.TO and 0.35% for FCCQ.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDUH.TO and FCCQ.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer