PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDTE vs. SDTY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDTE vs. SDTY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (XDTE) and YieldMax S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (SDTY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with XDTE having a 8.83% return and SDTY slightly lower at 8.45%.


XDTE

1D
-0.66%
1M
4.14%
YTD
8.83%
6M
8.93%
1Y
25.68%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SDTY

1D
-0.51%
1M
4.38%
YTD
8.45%
6M
8.89%
1Y
25.63%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDTE vs. SDTY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XDTE and SDTY is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 7, 2025

0.94

The correlation between XDTE and SDTY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

XDTE vs. SDTY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XDTE
SDTY

Technology

35.6%
35.6%

Financial Services

11.8%
11.8%

Communication Services

11.2%
11.2%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
10.1%

Healthcare

8.5%
8.5%

Industrials

8.3%
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
4.9%

Energy

3.5%
3.5%

Utilities

2.4%
2.4%

Real Estate

1.9%
1.9%

Basic Materials

1.8%
1.8%

Technology

XDTE
35.6%
SDTY
35.6%

Financial Services

XDTE
11.8%
SDTY
11.8%

Communication Services

XDTE
11.2%
SDTY
11.2%

Consumer Cyclical

XDTE
10.1%
SDTY
10.1%

Healthcare

XDTE
8.5%
SDTY
8.5%

Industrials

XDTE
8.3%
SDTY
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

XDTE
4.9%
SDTY
4.9%

Energy

XDTE
3.5%
SDTY
3.5%

Utilities

XDTE
2.4%
SDTY
2.4%

Real Estate

XDTE
1.9%
SDTY
1.9%

Basic Materials

XDTE
1.8%
SDTY
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDTE vs. SDTY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDTE
XDTE Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
XDTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDTE Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
XDTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDTE Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

SDTY
SDTY Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
SDTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SDTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
SDTY Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
SDTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
SDTY Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDTE vs. SDTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (XDTE) and YieldMax S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (SDTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XDTESDTYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.43

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.36

3.21

+0.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.35

13.58

+1.77

XDTE vs. SDTY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDTE Sharpe Ratio is 2.35, which is comparable to the SDTY Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDTE and SDTY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XDTESDTYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.35

2.34

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.25

0.85

+0.40

Drawdowns

XDTE vs. SDTY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDTE drawdown since its inception was -19.09%, roughly equal to the maximum SDTY drawdown of -18.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDTE and SDTY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDTESDTYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.09%

-18.63%

-0.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.68%

-8.02%

+0.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.66%

-0.62%

-0.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.32%

-3.02%

+0.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.68%

1.89%

-0.21%

Volatility

XDTE vs. SDTY - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (XDTE) and YieldMax S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (SDTY) have volatilities of 2.53% and 2.58%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDTESDTYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.53%

2.58%

-0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.28%

8.39%

-0.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.99%

11.00%

-0.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.85%

16.79%

-2.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.85%

16.79%

-2.94%

XDTE vs. SDTY - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDTE has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is lower than SDTY's 1.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

XDTE vs. SDTY - Dividend Comparison

XDTE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 33.00%, more than SDTY's 25.97% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, XDTE and SDTY move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SDTY has higher volatility (2.58%) compared to XDTE (2.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XDTE dropped -19.09% vs SDTY's -18.63%.

On 1-year performance, XDTE leads with 25.68% vs 25.63% for SDTY. On fees, XDTE is cheaper at 0.97% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, XDTE has performed better with a 25.68% return vs 25.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XDTE is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for SDTY.

XDTE has the higher dividend yield at 33.00%, compared with 25.97% for SDTY.

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for XDTE and 1.01% for SDTY.

XDTE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 2.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDTE and SDTY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer