XDTE vs. PLTW

Last updated Aug 6, 2026

XDTE (Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF) and PLTW (PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF) are both Derivative Income funds from Roundhill. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, XDTE returned 21.42% vs -18.30% for PLTW. Their 0.50 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. XDTE charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for PLTW.

Performance

XDTE vs. PLTW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (XDTE) and PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDTE achieves a 11.29% return, which is significantly higher than PLTW's -17.94% return.

XDTE

• 1D: 0.05%
• 1M: 2.01%
• 6M: 9.93%
• YTD: 11.29%
• 1Y: 21.42%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 17.24%

PLTW

• 1D: -3.46%
• 1M: 21.84%
• 6M: 10.43%
• YTD: -17.94%
• 1Y: -18.30%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 3.58%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
PLTW PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF	$3.85M	$3.27M	$3.81M
XDTE Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF	$7.06M	$7.78M	$7.52M

XDTE vs. PLTW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
XDTE Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF	11.29%	8.11%
PLTW PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF	-17.94%	28.26%

Correlation

The correlation between XDTE and PLTW is 0.43, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.43
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2025	0.50

XDTE vs. PLTW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XDTE	PLTW
Technology	39.0%	20.0%
Financial Services	11.1%	-
Communication Services	10.6%	-
Consumer Cyclical	9.9%	-
Healthcare	8.3%	-
Industrials	7.8%	-
Consumer Defensive	4.5%	-
Energy	3.1%	-
Utilities	2.1%	-
Real Estate	1.8%	-
Basic Materials	1.7%	-

Return for Risk

XDTE vs. PLTW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XDTE

XDTE Risk / Return Rank: 71
XDTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
XDTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
XDTE Omega Ratio Rank: 68
XDTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
XDTE Martin Ratio Rank: 80

PLTW

PLTW Risk / Return Rank: 8
PLTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
PLTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
PLTW Omega Ratio Rank: 10
PLTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
PLTW Martin Ratio Rank: 6

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XDTE vs. PLTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (XDTE) and PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XDTE	PLTW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.82	-0.26	+2.08
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.45	0.09	+2.36
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.01	+0.32
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.80	-0.32	+3.12
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.88	-0.58	+12.46

XDTE vs. PLTW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDTE Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is higher than the PLTW Sharpe Ratio of -0.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDTE and PLTW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XDTE vs. PLTW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDTE drawdown since its inception was -19.09%, smaller than the maximum PLTW drawdown of -57.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDTE and PLTW.

Drawdown Indicators

	XDTE	PLTW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.09%	-57.27%	+38.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.68%	-57.27%	+49.59%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-32.88%	+32.88%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.25%	-25.30%	+23.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.81%	31.76%	-29.95%

Volatility

XDTE vs. PLTW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (XDTE) is 3.60%, while PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW) has a volatility of 34.60%. This indicates that XDTE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PLTW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XDTE	PLTW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.60%	34.60%	-31.00%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.33%	57.23%	-47.90%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.84%	71.89%	-60.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.85%	78.99%	-65.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.85%	78.99%	-65.14%

XDTE vs. PLTW - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDTE has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is lower than PLTW's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

XDTE vs. PLTW - Dividend Comparison

XDTE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 31.42%, less than PLTW's 101.90% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
PLTW PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF	101.90%	72.40%	0.00%
XDTE Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF	31.42%	39.16%	20.35%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XDTE and PLTW in my portfolio?

XDTE and PLTW have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XDTE or PLTW?

PLTW has higher volatility (34.60%) compared to XDTE (3.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XDTE dropped -19.09% vs PLTW's -57.27%.

Which ETF is better, XDTE or PLTW?

On 1-year performance, XDTE leads with 21.42% vs -18.30% for PLTW. On fees, XDTE is cheaper at 0.97% per year. On volatility, XDTE has been the lower-risk option at 3.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XDTE or PLTW?

Over the 1-year period, XDTE has performed better with a 21.42% return vs -18.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XDTE or PLTW?

XDTE is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for PLTW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XDTE or PLTW?

PLTW has the higher dividend yield at 101.90%, compared with 31.42% for XDTE.

What is the main difference between XDTE and PLTW?

Their fees differ too: 0.97% for XDTE and 0.99% for PLTW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XDTE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs -0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.