XDTE vs. GDXY
XDTE (Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF) and GDXY (YieldMax Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Over the past year, XDTE returned 25.68% vs 30.32% for GDXY. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XDTE charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for GDXY.
Performance
XDTE vs. GDXY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XDTE achieves a 8.83% return, which is significantly higher than GDXY's -6.82% return.
XDTE
- 1D
- -0.66%
- 1M
- 4.14%
- YTD
- 8.83%
- 6M
- 8.93%
- 1Y
- 25.68%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GDXY
- 1D
- -2.47%
- 1M
- -2.37%
- YTD
- -6.82%
- 6M
- -3.09%
- 1Y
- 30.32%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XDTE vs. GDXY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
XDTE Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF | 8.83% | 12.60% | 12.52% |
GDXY YieldMax Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF | -6.82% | 88.08% | -11.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDTE and GDXY is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2024 | 0.26 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDTE vs. GDXY — Risk / Return Rank
XDTE
GDXY
XDTE vs. GDXY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (XDTE) and YieldMax Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF (GDXY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XDTE | GDXY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.17 | +0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.36 | 1.09 | +2.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.35 | 2.77 | +12.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XDTE | GDXY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.35 | 0.83 | +1.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.25 | 0.76 | +0.49 |
Drawdowns
XDTE vs. GDXY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDTE drawdown since its inception was -19.09%, smaller than the maximum GDXY drawdown of -28.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDTE and GDXY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDTE | GDXY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.09% | -28.03% | +8.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.68% | -28.03% | +20.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.66% | -25.20% | +24.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.32% | -6.40% | +4.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.68% | 10.96% | -9.28% |
Volatility
XDTE vs. GDXY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (XDTE) is 2.53%, while YieldMax Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF (GDXY) has a volatility of 11.75%. This indicates that XDTE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDXY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDTE | GDXY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.53% | 11.75% | -9.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.28% | 30.92% | -22.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.99% | 36.57% | -25.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.85% | 31.73% | -17.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.85% | 31.73% | -17.88% |
XDTE vs. GDXY - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDTE has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is lower than GDXY's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
XDTE vs. GDXY - Dividend Comparison
XDTE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 33.00%, less than GDXY's 74.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
GDXY YieldMax Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF | 74.25% | 52.13% | 23.91% |
XDTE Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF | 33.00% | 39.16% | 20.35% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XDTE and GDXY have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GDXY has higher volatility (11.75%) compared to XDTE (2.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XDTE dropped -19.09% vs GDXY's -28.03%.
On 1-year performance, GDXY leads with 30.32% vs 25.68% for XDTE. On fees, XDTE is cheaper at 0.97% per year. On volatility, XDTE has been the lower-risk option at 2.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GDXY has performed better with a 30.32% return vs 25.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XDTE is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for GDXY.
GDXY has the higher dividend yield at 74.25%, compared with 33.00% for XDTE.
They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for XDTE and 0.99% for GDXY.
XDTE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XDTE and GDXY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer