PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
XDSR.TO vs. DRFD.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

XDSR.TO vs. DRFD.TO

Last updated Jul 18, 2026
Documentation

XDSR.TO (iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE Index ETF) and DRFD.TO (Desjardins RI Developed ex-USA ex-Canada Multifactor - Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. XDSR.TO is passively managed, while DRFD.TO is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, XDSR.TO returned 9.14%/yr vs 11.65%/yr for DRFD.TO. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

XDSR.TO vs. DRFD.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE Index ETF (XDSR.TO) and Desjardins RI Developed ex-USA ex-Canada Multifactor - Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF (DRFD.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDSR.TO achieves a 13.37% return, which is significantly higher than DRFD.TO's 11.46% return.

XDSR.TO

1D
-0.92%
1M
-1.94%
6M
7.79%
YTD
13.37%
1Y
19.98%
3Y*
15.72%
5Y*
9.14%
10Y*
—

DRFD.TO

1D
0.03%
1M
1.33%
6M
8.14%
YTD
11.46%
1Y
25.18%
3Y*
21.46%
5Y*
11.65%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDSR.TO vs. DRFD.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
XDSR.TO
iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE Index ETF		13.37%16.99%12.43%16.82%-14.11%10.06%23.07%
DRFD.TO
Desjardins RI Developed ex-USA ex-Canada Multifactor - Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF		11.46%30.23%16.52%12.80%-10.88%9.94%19.16%

Correlation

The correlation between XDSR.TO and DRFD.TO is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2020

0.26

Over the past year, XDSR.TO and DRFD.TO have become more correlated (0.60) than their long-term average of 0.26, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE Index ETF

Desjardins RI Developed ex-USA ex-Canada Multifactor - Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF

Often compared with XDSR.TO:
XDSR.TO vs. XSEA.TOXDSR.TO vs. XSEM.TOXDSR.TO vs. XEN.TOXDSR.TO vs. XAW.TOXDSR.TO vs. IMTMXDSR.TO vs. XUSR.TOXDSR.TO vs. ZXM.TO
Often compared with DRFD.TO:
DRFD.TO vs. DANC.TODRFD.TO vs. DCG.TODRFD.TO vs. DCP.TODRFD.TO vs. DCS.TODRFD.TO vs. DRFE.TODRFD.TO vs. DRFG.TODRFD.TO vs. DRFU.TO

Return for Risk

XDSR.TO vs. DRFD.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
XDSR.TO
XDSR.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
XDSR.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDSR.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDSR.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
XDSR.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDSR.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
DRFD.TO
DRFD.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
DRFD.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRFD.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRFD.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
DRFD.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRFD.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDSR.TO vs. DRFD.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE Index ETF (XDSR.TO) and Desjardins RI Developed ex-USA ex-Canada Multifactor - Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF (DRFD.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

XDSR.TODRFD.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.26
1.75

-0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.87
2.57

-0.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.34

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.66

2.13

-0.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.47

8.31

-1.83

XDSR.TO vs. DRFD.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDSR.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is comparable to the DRFD.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDSR.TO and DRFD.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XDSR.TO vs. DRFD.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDSR.TO drawdown since its inception was -29.62%, which is greater than DRFD.TO's maximum drawdown of -25.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDSR.TO and DRFD.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

XDSR.TODRFD.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.62%

-25.18%

-4.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.06%

-11.85%

-0.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.63%

-13.78%

-1.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.62%

-22.31%

-7.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.92%

-2.61%

-1.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.24%

-5.26%

-0.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.09%

3.04%

+0.05%

Volatility

XDSR.TO vs. DRFD.TO - Volatility Comparison

iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE Index ETF (XDSR.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.63% compared to Desjardins RI Developed ex-USA ex-Canada Multifactor - Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF (DRFD.TO) at 3.62%. This indicates that XDSR.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DRFD.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

XDSR.TODRFD.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.63%

3.62%

+1.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.68%

12.44%

+1.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.96%

14.42%

+1.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.06%

13.39%

+1.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.82%

13.67%

+1.15%

Dividends

XDSR.TO vs. DRFD.TO - Dividend Comparison

XDSR.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.73%, less than DRFD.TO's 2.38% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
DRFD.TO
Desjardins RI Developed ex-USA ex-Canada Multifactor - Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF		2.38%2.68%2.55%2.17%2.74%2.38%2.55%2.34%0.72%
XDSR.TO
iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE Index ETF		1.73%1.83%1.94%1.94%2.27%1.45%0.77%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

XDSR.TO and DRFD.TO have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Desjardins.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDSR.TO and DRFD.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer