XDRE.DE vs. R8T.DE
XDRE.DE (Xtrackers Developed Green Real Estate ESG UCITS ETF 1C) and R8T.DE (abrdn Future Real Estate UCITS ETF) are both REIT funds. XDRE.DE is passively managed, while R8T.DE is actively managed. Over the past year, XDRE.DE returned 9.60% vs 5.91% for R8T.DE. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XDRE.DE charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for R8T.DE.
Performance
XDRE.DE vs. R8T.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XDRE.DE achieves a 7.27% return, which is significantly higher than R8T.DE's 5.83% return.
XDRE.DE
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- 0.53%
- YTD
- 7.27%
- 6M
- 6.71%
- 1Y
- 9.60%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
R8T.DE
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- -1.10%
- YTD
- 5.83%
- 6M
- 5.46%
- 1Y
- 5.91%
- 3Y*
- 3.46%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XDRE.DE vs. R8T.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
XDRE.DE Xtrackers Developed Green Real Estate ESG UCITS ETF 1C | 7.27% | -2.46% | -3.63% |
R8T.DE abrdn Future Real Estate UCITS ETF | 5.83% | -3.97% | -4.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDRE.DE and R8T.DE is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2024 | 0.93 |
The correlation between XDRE.DE and R8T.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDRE.DE vs. R8T.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XDRE.DE
R8T.DE
XDRE.DE vs. R8T.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Developed Green Real Estate ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XDRE.DE) and abrdn Future Real Estate UCITS ETF (R8T.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XDRE.DE | R8T.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.11 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.41 | 0.32 | +1.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.22 | 0.55 | +3.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XDRE.DE | R8T.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 | 0.24 | +0.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.04 | 0.16 | -0.12 |
Drawdowns
XDRE.DE vs. R8T.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDRE.DE drawdown since its inception was -20.91%, roughly equal to the maximum R8T.DE drawdown of -21.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDRE.DE and R8T.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDRE.DE | R8T.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.91% | -21.76% | +0.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.79% | -18.35% | +11.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -21.76% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.81% | -11.79% | +8.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.22% | -7.54% | -0.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.27% | 10.72% | -8.45% |
Volatility
XDRE.DE vs. R8T.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers Developed Green Real Estate ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XDRE.DE) and abrdn Future Real Estate UCITS ETF (R8T.DE) have volatilities of 2.92% and 2.99%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDRE.DE | R8T.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.92% | 2.99% | -0.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.43% | 9.05% | -0.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.17% | 24.56% | -13.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.01% | 18.55% | -4.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.01% | 18.55% | -4.54% |
XDRE.DE vs. R8T.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDRE.DE has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than R8T.DE's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
XDRE.DE vs. R8T.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XDRE.DE nor R8T.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, XDRE.DE and R8T.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, XDRE.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDRE.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for R8T.DE.
They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and abrdn. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for XDRE.DE and 0.40% for R8T.DE.
Find the right allocation for XDRE.DE and R8T.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer