PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDQQ vs. TSMG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDQQ vs. TSMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Growth Accelerated ETF - Quarterly (XDQQ) and Leverage Shares 2X Long TSM Daily ETF (TSMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDQQ achieves a 2.83% return, which is significantly lower than TSMG's 80.39% return.


XDQQ

1D
-0.06%
1M
0.56%
YTD
2.83%
6M
1.08%
1Y
16.74%
3Y*
17.58%
5Y*
7.88%
10Y*

TSMG

1D
-13.49%
1M
12.90%
YTD
80.39%
6M
88.25%
1Y
241.80%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDQQ vs. TSMG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XDQQ and TSMG is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2025

0.63

The correlation between XDQQ and TSMG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDQQ vs. TSMG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDQQ
XDQQ Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
XDQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
XDQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

TSMG
TSMG Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
TSMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSMG Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
TSMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSMG Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDQQ vs. TSMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Growth Accelerated ETF - Quarterly (XDQQ) and Leverage Shares 2X Long TSM Daily ETF (TSMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XDQQTSMGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.95

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.39

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.42

6.90

-5.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.45

22.04

-15.59

XDQQ vs. TSMG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDQQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is lower than the TSMG Sharpe Ratio of 3.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDQQ and TSMG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XDQQ vs. TSMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDQQ drawdown since its inception was -35.63%, smaller than the maximum TSMG drawdown of -63.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDQQ and TSMG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDQQTSMGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.63%

-63.67%

+28.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.84%

-35.29%

+23.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.06%

-13.49%

+13.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.72%

-16.65%

+5.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.60%

11.03%

-8.43%

Volatility

XDQQ vs. TSMG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Growth Accelerated ETF - Quarterly (XDQQ) is 0.64%, while Leverage Shares 2X Long TSM Daily ETF (TSMG) has a volatility of 33.00%. This indicates that XDQQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSMG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDQQTSMGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.64%

33.00%

-32.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.31%

60.76%

-50.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.80%

76.78%

-62.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.80%

83.21%

-63.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.55%

83.21%

-63.66%

XDQQ vs. TSMG - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDQQ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than TSMG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

XDQQ vs. TSMG - Dividend Comparison

XDQQ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TSMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.37%.


Frequently Asked Questions


XDQQ and TSMG have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TSMG has higher volatility (33.00%) compared to XDQQ (0.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XDQQ dropped -35.63% vs TSMG's -63.67%.

On 1-year performance, TSMG leads with 241.80% vs 16.74% for XDQQ. On fees, TSMG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, XDQQ has been the lower-risk option at 0.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TSMG has performed better with a 241.80% return vs 16.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TSMG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for XDQQ.

TSMG has the higher dividend yield at 6.37%, compared with 0.00% for XDQQ.

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for XDQQ and 0.75% for TSMG.

TSMG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.17 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDQQ and TSMG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer