PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDQQ vs. BUFF
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XDQQ vs. BUFF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Growth Accelerated ETF - Quarterly (XDQQ) and Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF (BUFF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XDQQ vs. BUFF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
XDQQ
Innovator Growth Accelerated ETF - Quarterly
-5.48%13.75%31.47%30.15%-33.74%18.29%
BUFF
Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF
-0.54%11.02%12.05%16.51%-4.44%5.48%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDQQ achieves a -5.48% return, which is significantly lower than BUFF's -0.54% return.


XDQQ

1D
1.03%
1M
-5.50%
YTD
-5.48%
6M
-1.65%
1Y
16.74%
3Y*
17.89%
5Y*
10Y*

BUFF

1D
0.36%
1M
-1.47%
YTD
-0.54%
6M
1.29%
1Y
12.22%
3Y*
11.35%
5Y*
7.76%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XDQQ vs. BUFF - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDQQ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFF's 0.89% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

XDQQ vs. BUFF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDQQ
XDQQ Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
XDQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
XDQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

BUFF
BUFF Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
BUFF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUFF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUFF Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
BUFF Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUFF Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDQQ vs. BUFF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Growth Accelerated ETF - Quarterly (XDQQ) and Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF (BUFF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XDQQBUFFDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.78

1.25

-0.47

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.27

1.86

-0.59

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.32

-0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.38

1.74

-0.37

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.03

9.81

-3.78

XDQQ vs. BUFF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDQQ Sharpe Ratio is 0.78, which is lower than the BUFF Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDQQ and BUFF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XDQQBUFFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

1.25

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.46

-0.08

Correlation

The correlation between XDQQ and BUFF is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

XDQQ vs. BUFF - Dividend Comparison

Neither XDQQ nor BUFF has paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
XDQQ
Innovator Growth Accelerated ETF - Quarterly
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BUFF
Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.78%1.26%1.74%1.55%0.18%

Drawdowns

XDQQ vs. BUFF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDQQ drawdown since its inception was -35.63%, smaller than the maximum BUFF drawdown of -46.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDQQ and BUFF.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


XDQQBUFFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.63%

-46.23%

+10.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.64%

-7.15%

-5.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.84%

-1.82%

-6.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.14%

-6.29%

-4.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.88%

1.27%

+1.61%

Volatility

XDQQ vs. BUFF - Volatility Comparison

Innovator Growth Accelerated ETF - Quarterly (XDQQ) has a higher volatility of 7.13% compared to Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF (BUFF) at 2.63%. This indicates that XDQQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BUFF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


XDQQBUFFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.13%

2.63%

+4.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.80%

4.06%

+8.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.42%

9.82%

+11.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.95%

8.40%

+11.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.95%

17.82%

+2.13%