PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDQQ vs. BUFF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDQQ vs. BUFF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Growth Accelerated ETF - Quarterly (XDQQ) and Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF (BUFF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDQQ achieves a 2.62% return, which is significantly lower than BUFF's 5.58% return.


XDQQ

1D
0.04%
1M
1.17%
YTD
2.62%
6M
2.67%
1Y
17.22%
3Y*
17.88%
5Y*
8.32%
10Y*

BUFF

1D
0.15%
1M
1.62%
YTD
5.58%
6M
6.06%
1Y
14.66%
3Y*
12.56%
5Y*
8.75%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDQQ vs. BUFF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
XDQQ
Innovator Growth Accelerated ETF - Quarterly
2.62%13.75%31.47%30.15%-33.74%18.29%
BUFF
Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF
5.58%11.02%12.05%16.51%-4.44%5.48%

Correlation

The correlation between XDQQ and BUFF is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2021

0.84

The correlation between XDQQ and BUFF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

XDQQ vs. BUFF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XDQQ
BUFF

Technology

50.7%
36.2%

Communication Services

15.8%
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

12.5%
10.1%

Consumer Defensive

8.7%
4.9%

Healthcare

5.1%
8.4%

Industrials

3.3%
8.1%

Utilities

1.6%
2.3%

Basic Materials

1.3%
1.8%

Energy

0.7%
3.5%

Financial Services

0.2%
11.9%

Real Estate

0.1%
1.9%

Technology

XDQQ
50.7%
BUFF
36.2%

Communication Services

XDQQ
15.8%
BUFF
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

XDQQ
12.5%
BUFF
10.1%

Consumer Defensive

XDQQ
8.7%
BUFF
4.9%

Healthcare

XDQQ
5.1%
BUFF
8.4%

Industrials

XDQQ
3.3%
BUFF
8.1%

Utilities

XDQQ
1.6%
BUFF
2.3%

Basic Materials

XDQQ
1.3%
BUFF
1.8%

Energy

XDQQ
0.7%
BUFF
3.5%

Financial Services

XDQQ
0.2%
BUFF
11.9%

Real Estate

XDQQ
0.1%
BUFF
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDQQ vs. BUFF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDQQ
XDQQ Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
XDQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
XDQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

BUFF
BUFF Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
BUFF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUFF Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUFF Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
BUFF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUFF Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDQQ vs. BUFF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Growth Accelerated ETF - Quarterly (XDQQ) and Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF (BUFF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XDQQBUFFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.60

-0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.46

4.11

-2.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.63

21.95

-15.32

XDQQ vs. BUFF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDQQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is lower than the BUFF Sharpe Ratio of 2.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDQQ and BUFF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XDQQBUFFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.25

2.86

-1.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

1.04

-0.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.49

-0.03

Drawdowns

XDQQ vs. BUFF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDQQ drawdown since its inception was -35.63%, smaller than the maximum BUFF drawdown of -46.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDQQ and BUFF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDQQBUFFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.63%

-46.23%

+10.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.84%

-3.58%

-8.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.17%

-10.24%

-12.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.63%

-10.24%

-25.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.01%

-0.11%

+0.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.83%

-6.18%

-4.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.60%

0.67%

+1.93%

Volatility

XDQQ vs. BUFF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Growth Accelerated ETF - Quarterly (XDQQ) is 0.36%, while Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF (BUFF) has a volatility of 1.01%. This indicates that XDQQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BUFF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDQQBUFFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.36%

1.01%

-0.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.10%

3.83%

+7.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.80%

5.15%

+8.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.80%

8.41%

+11.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.65%

17.67%

+1.98%

XDQQ vs. BUFF - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDQQ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFF's 0.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

XDQQ vs. BUFF - Dividend Comparison

Neither XDQQ nor BUFF has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BUFF
Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.78%1.26%1.74%1.55%0.18%
XDQQ
Innovator Growth Accelerated ETF - Quarterly
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XDQQ and BUFF have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BUFF has higher volatility (1.01%) compared to XDQQ (0.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XDQQ dropped -35.63% vs BUFF's -46.23%.

On 5-year performance, BUFF leads with 8.75% vs 8.32% for XDQQ. On fees, XDQQ is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, XDQQ has been the lower-risk option at 0.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BUFF has performed better with a 8.75% return vs 8.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XDQQ is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for BUFF.

XDQQ and BUFF have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

XDQQ is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while BUFF is Defined Outcome. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for XDQQ and 0.89% for BUFF.

BUFF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.86 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDQQ and BUFF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer