PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDPU.L vs. XDWE.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDPU.L vs. XDWE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers S&P 500 UCITS ETF 4C (XDPU.L) and Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1C (XDWE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XDPU.L is traded in USD, while XDWE.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XDWE.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDPU.L achieves a 7.55% return, which is significantly lower than XDWE.L's 13.53% return.


XDPU.L

1D
-0.87%
1M
-0.03%
6M
6.03%
YTD
7.55%
1Y
16.44%
3Y*
18.41%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
16.47%

XDWE.L

1D
1.50%
1M
2.49%
6M
9.63%
YTD
13.53%
1Y
18.46%
3Y*
13.68%
5Y*
8.80%
10Y*
11.63%
ALL TIME*
54.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$384.88K$1.17M$724.46K
$1.98M$2.08M$2.45M

XDPU.L vs. XDWE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XDPU.L
Xtrackers S&P 500 UCITS ETF 4C
7.55%17.36%25.28%26.77%-6.22%
XDWE.L
Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1C
13.53%11.79%12.16%13.47%-3.76%

Correlation

The correlation between XDPU.L and XDWE.L is 0.66, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 8, 2022

0.76

The correlation between XDPU.L and XDWE.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDPU.L vs. XDWE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDPU.L
XDPU.L Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
XDPU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDPU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDPU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
XDPU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDPU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

XDWE.L
XDWE.L Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
XDWE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDWE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDWE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
XDWE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDWE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDPU.L vs. XDWE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P 500 UCITS ETF 4C (XDPU.L) and Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1C (XDWE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XDPU.LXDWE.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.31

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.03

2.59

-0.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.09

9.48

-1.39

XDPU.L vs. XDWE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDPU.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is comparable to the XDWE.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDPU.L and XDWE.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XDPU.L vs. XDWE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDPU.L drawdown since its inception was -18.25%, smaller than the maximum XDWE.L drawdown of -98.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDPU.L and XDWE.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDPU.LXDWE.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.25%

-98.45%

+80.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.22%

-7.08%

-1.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.25%

-19.08%

+0.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.08%

0.00%

-3.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.05%

-4.98%

+1.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.07%

1.93%

+0.14%

Volatility

XDPU.L vs. XDWE.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers S&P 500 UCITS ETF 4C (XDPU.L) has a higher volatility of 3.39% compared to Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1C (XDWE.L) at 2.65%. This indicates that XDPU.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDWE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDPU.LXDWE.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.39%

2.65%

+0.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.46%

7.19%

+2.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.17%

10.09%

+2.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.22%

20.55%

-5.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.22%

19.37%

-4.15%

XDPU.L vs. XDWE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDPU.L has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than XDWE.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XDPU.L vs. XDWE.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XDPU.L nor XDWE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XDPU.L and XDWE.L have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XDPU.L is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDPU.L is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XDWE.L.

XDPU.L tracks S&P 500 Index, while XDWE.L tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for XDPU.L and 0.20% for XDWE.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDPU.L and XDWE.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer