PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDPU.L vs. SPXP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDPU.L vs. SPXP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers S&P 500 UCITS ETF 4C (XDPU.L) and Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XDPU.L is traded in USD, while SPXP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SPXP.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDPU.L achieves a 7.55% return, which is significantly lower than SPXP.L's 8.46% return.


XDPU.L

1D
-0.87%
1M
-0.03%
6M
6.03%
YTD
7.55%
1Y
16.44%
3Y*
18.41%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
16.47%

SPXP.L

1D
0.55%
1M
1.00%
6M
6.45%
YTD
8.46%
1Y
-98.82%
3Y*
-74.37%
5Y*
-55.23%
10Y*
-27.51%
ALL TIME*
-22.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$3.91M$4.29M$4.77M
$384.88K$1.17M$724.46K

XDPU.L vs. SPXP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XDPU.L
Xtrackers S&P 500 UCITS ETF 4C
7.55%17.36%25.28%26.77%-6.22%
SPXP.L
Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF
8.46%-98.82%25.46%26.40%-6.01%

Correlation

The correlation between XDPU.L and SPXP.L is 0.92, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 8, 2022

0.92

The correlation between XDPU.L and SPXP.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDPU.L vs. SPXP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDPU.L
XDPU.L Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
XDPU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDPU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDPU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
XDPU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDPU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

SPXP.L
SPXP.L Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
SPXP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPXP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPXP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
SPXP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPXP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDPU.L vs. SPXP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P 500 UCITS ETF 4C (XDPU.L) and Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XDPU.LSPXP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

0.50

+0.75

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.03

-1.00

+3.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.09

-1.20

+9.29

XDPU.L vs. SPXP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDPU.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is higher than the SPXP.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDPU.L and SPXP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XDPU.L vs. SPXP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDPU.L drawdown since its inception was -18.25%, smaller than the maximum SPXP.L drawdown of -99.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDPU.L and SPXP.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDPU.LSPXP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.25%

-99.07%

+80.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.22%

-99.07%

+90.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.25%

-99.07%

+80.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-99.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.08%

-98.91%

+95.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.05%

-9.67%

+6.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.07%

82.48%

-80.41%

Volatility

XDPU.L vs. SPXP.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers S&P 500 UCITS ETF 4C (XDPU.L) and Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXP.L) have volatilities of 3.39% and 3.32%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDPU.LSPXP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.39%

3.32%

+0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.46%

8.77%

+0.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.17%

99.37%

-87.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.22%

46.97%

-31.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.22%

35.21%

-19.99%

XDPU.L vs. SPXP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDPU.L has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than SPXP.L's 0.05% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XDPU.L vs. SPXP.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XDPU.L nor SPXP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, XDPU.L and SPXP.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, XDPU.L is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDPU.L is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.05% for SPXP.L.

Both ETFs track S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for XDPU.L and 0.05% for SPXP.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDPU.L and SPXP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer