PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDPU.L vs. SPX5.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDPU.L vs. SPX5.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers S&P 500 UCITS ETF 4C (XDPU.L) and SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPX5.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XDPU.L is traded in USD, while SPX5.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the SPX5.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDPU.L achieves a 7.55% return, which is significantly lower than SPX5.L's 8.37% return.


XDPU.L

1D
-0.87%
1M
-0.03%
6M
6.03%
YTD
7.55%
1Y
16.44%
3Y*
18.41%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
16.47%

SPX5.L

1D
0.54%
1M
0.97%
6M
6.36%
YTD
8.37%
1Y
17.84%
3Y*
18.77%
5Y*
12.25%
10Y*
14.52%
ALL TIME*
10.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$6.48M$6.91M$10.69M
$384.88K$1.17M$724.46K

XDPU.L vs. SPX5.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XDPU.L
Xtrackers S&P 500 UCITS ETF 4C
7.55%17.36%25.28%26.77%-6.22%
SPX5.L
SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF
8.37%17.59%25.34%26.07%-6.15%

Correlation

The correlation between XDPU.L and SPX5.L is 0.92, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 8, 2022

0.92

The correlation between XDPU.L and SPX5.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDPU.L vs. SPX5.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDPU.L
XDPU.L Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
XDPU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDPU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDPU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
XDPU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDPU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

SPX5.L
SPX5.L Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
SPX5.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPX5.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPX5.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
SPX5.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPX5.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDPU.L vs. SPX5.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P 500 UCITS ETF 4C (XDPU.L) and SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPX5.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XDPU.LSPX5.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.27

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.03

2.06

-0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.09

8.27

-0.18

XDPU.L vs. SPX5.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDPU.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is comparable to the SPX5.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDPU.L and SPX5.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XDPU.L vs. SPX5.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDPU.L drawdown since its inception was -18.25%, smaller than the maximum SPX5.L drawdown of -42.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDPU.L and SPX5.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDPU.LSPX5.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.25%

-42.43%

+24.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.22%

-8.64%

+0.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.25%

-18.43%

+0.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.08%

-2.24%

-0.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.05%

-7.94%

+4.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.07%

2.15%

-0.08%

Volatility

XDPU.L vs. SPX5.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers S&P 500 UCITS ETF 4C (XDPU.L) and SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPX5.L) have volatilities of 3.39% and 3.24%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDPU.LSPX5.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.39%

3.24%

+0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.46%

8.68%

+0.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.17%

11.65%

+0.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.22%

15.59%

-0.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.22%

16.04%

-0.82%

XDPU.L vs. SPX5.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XDPU.L and SPX5.L have an expense ratio of 0.03%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XDPU.L vs. SPX5.L - Dividend Comparison

XDPU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPX5.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPX5.L
SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF
0.92%0.98%1.03%1.21%1.39%0.98%1.40%1.48%0.78%1.19%1.49%1.68%
XDPU.L
Xtrackers S&P 500 UCITS ETF 4C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, XDPU.L and SPX5.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Both ETFs have the same 0.03% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDPU.L and SPX5.L have the same expense ratio: 0.03% per year.

Both ETFs track S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and State Street.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDPU.L and SPX5.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer