XDPG.L vs. XCX5.L
XDPG.L (Xtrackers S&P 500 UCITS ETF 2C - GBP Hedged) and XCX5.L (Xtrackers MSCI India Swap UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - XDPG.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 GBP Hedged, while XCX5.L is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI India NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XDPG.L returned 13.60%/yr vs 7.44%/yr for XCX5.L. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XDPG.L charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for XCX5.L.
Performance
XDPG.L vs. XCX5.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XDPG.L achieves a 9.91% return, which is significantly higher than XCX5.L's -12.70% return. Over the past 10 years, XDPG.L has outperformed XCX5.L with an annualized return of 13.60%, while XCX5.L has yielded a comparatively lower 7.44% annualized return.
XDPG.L
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 4.52%
- YTD
- 9.91%
- 6M
- 10.64%
- 1Y
- 27.07%
- 3Y*
- 21.39%
- 5Y*
- 12.48%
- 10Y*
- 13.60%
XCX5.L
- 1D
- 1.26%
- 1M
- -1.73%
- YTD
- -12.70%
- 6M
- -12.76%
- 1Y
- -12.07%
- 3Y*
- 2.47%
- 5Y*
- 4.13%
- 10Y*
- 7.44%
XDPG.L vs. XCX5.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDPG.L Xtrackers S&P 500 UCITS ETF 2C - GBP Hedged | 9.91% | 16.95% | 24.90% | 24.82% | -20.73% | 28.87% | 15.23% | 27.55% | -7.58% | 19.91% |
XCX5.L Xtrackers MSCI India Swap UCITS ETF 1C | -12.70% | -5.16% | 11.92% | 12.56% | 2.33% | 26.19% | 9.49% | 2.58% | -3.56% | 24.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDPG.L and XCX5.L is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2015 | 0.36 |
The correlation between XDPG.L and XCX5.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (3 years) to 0.36 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XDPG.L vs. XCX5.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XDPG.L
XCX5.L
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
XDPG.L
XCX5.L
Financial Services
XDPG.L
XCX5.L
Communication Services
XDPG.L
XCX5.L
Consumer Cyclical
XDPG.L
XCX5.L
Healthcare
XDPG.L
XCX5.L
Industrials
XDPG.L
XCX5.L
Consumer Defensive
XDPG.L
XCX5.L
Energy
XDPG.L
XCX5.L
Utilities
XDPG.L
XCX5.L
Real Estate
XDPG.L
XCX5.L
Basic Materials
XDPG.L
XCX5.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDPG.L vs. XCX5.L — Risk / Return Rank
XDPG.L
XCX5.L
XDPG.L vs. XCX5.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P 500 UCITS ETF 2C - GBP Hedged (XDPG.L) and Xtrackers MSCI India Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCX5.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XDPG.L | XCX5.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 0.89 | +0.53 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.24 | -0.60 | +3.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.93 | -1.37 | +15.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XDPG.L | XCX5.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.32 | -0.76 | +3.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 | 0.26 | +0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.82 | 0.37 | +0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.74 | 0.23 | +0.52 |
Drawdowns
XDPG.L vs. XCX5.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDPG.L drawdown since its inception was -35.91%, smaller than the maximum XCX5.L drawdown of -41.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDPG.L and XCX5.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDPG.L | XCX5.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.91% | -41.74% | +5.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.31% | -19.88% | +11.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.07% | -26.47% | +7.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.62% | -26.47% | +0.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.91% | -37.35% | +1.44% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.53% | -23.06% | +22.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.80% | -11.04% | +6.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.94% | 8.81% | -6.87% |
Volatility
XDPG.L vs. XCX5.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers S&P 500 UCITS ETF 2C - GBP Hedged (XDPG.L) is 3.18%, while Xtrackers MSCI India Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCX5.L) has a volatility of 6.39%. This indicates that XDPG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XCX5.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDPG.L | XCX5.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.18% | 6.39% | -3.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.59% | 13.26% | -4.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.62% | 15.78% | -4.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.00% | 15.92% | +0.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.60% | 19.89% | -3.29% |
XDPG.L vs. XCX5.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDPG.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than XCX5.L's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
XDPG.L vs. XCX5.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XDPG.L nor XCX5.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XDPG.L and XCX5.L have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XDPG.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDPG.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for XCX5.L.
XDPG.L is categorized as S&P 500, while XCX5.L is Asia Pacific Equities. XDPG.L tracks S&P 500 GBP Hedged, while XCX5.L tracks MSCI India NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for XDPG.L and 0.75% for XCX5.L.
Find the right allocation for XDPG.L and XCX5.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer