PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDPG.L vs. SPX5.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDPG.L vs. SPX5.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers S&P 500 UCITS ETF 2C - GBP Hedged (XDPG.L) and SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPX5.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XDPG.L is traded in GBp, while SPX5.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the SPX5.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDPG.L achieves a 8.53% return, which is significantly lower than SPX5.L's 9.06% return. Over the past 10 years, XDPG.L has underperformed SPX5.L with an annualized return of 13.16%, while SPX5.L has yielded a comparatively higher 14.33% annualized return.


XDPG.L

1D
-1.21%
1M
-0.51%
6M
7.58%
YTD
8.53%
1Y
19.27%
3Y*
18.73%
5Y*
11.48%
10Y*
13.16%

SPX5.L

1D
-0.98%
1M
-0.94%
6M
7.51%
YTD
9.06%
1Y
19.65%
3Y*
18.28%
5Y*
13.33%
10Y*
14.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDPG.L vs. SPX5.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XDPG.L
Xtrackers S&P 500 UCITS ETF 2C - GBP Hedged
8.53%16.95%24.90%24.82%-20.73%28.87%15.23%27.53%-7.58%19.92%
SPX5.L
SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF
9.06%9.34%27.46%19.76%-9.00%30.96%13.52%26.33%-0.90%10.29%

Correlation

The correlation between XDPG.L and SPX5.L is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2015

0.76

The correlation between XDPG.L and SPX5.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

XDPG.L vs. SPX5.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XDPG.L
SPX5.L

Technology

39.0%
39.1%

Financial Services

11.1%
11.1%

Communication Services

10.7%
10.8%

Consumer Cyclical

9.9%
9.9%

Healthcare

8.3%
8.4%

Industrials

7.8%
7.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.5%
4.5%

Energy

3.1%
3.2%

Utilities

2.1%
2.1%

Real Estate

1.8%
1.8%

Basic Materials

1.7%
1.3%

Technology

XDPG.L
39.0%
SPX5.L
39.1%

Financial Services

XDPG.L
11.1%
SPX5.L
11.1%

Communication Services

XDPG.L
10.7%
SPX5.L
10.8%

Consumer Cyclical

XDPG.L
9.9%
SPX5.L
9.9%

Healthcare

XDPG.L
8.3%
SPX5.L
8.4%

Industrials

XDPG.L
7.8%
SPX5.L
7.8%

Consumer Defensive

XDPG.L
4.5%
SPX5.L
4.5%

Energy

XDPG.L
3.1%
SPX5.L
3.2%

Utilities

XDPG.L
2.1%
SPX5.L
2.1%

Real Estate

XDPG.L
1.8%
SPX5.L
1.8%

Basic Materials

XDPG.L
1.7%
SPX5.L
1.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDPG.L vs. SPX5.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDPG.L
XDPG.L Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
XDPG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDPG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDPG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
XDPG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDPG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

SPX5.L
SPX5.L Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
SPX5.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPX5.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPX5.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
SPX5.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPX5.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDPG.L vs. SPX5.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P 500 UCITS ETF 2C - GBP Hedged (XDPG.L) and SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPX5.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XDPG.LSPX5.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.33

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.31

2.77

-0.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.32

9.88

-0.56

XDPG.L vs. SPX5.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDPG.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is comparable to the SPX5.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDPG.L and SPX5.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XDPG.L vs. SPX5.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDPG.L drawdown since its inception was -35.91%, smaller than the maximum SPX5.L drawdown of -41.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDPG.L and SPX5.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDPG.LSPX5.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.91%

-41.23%

+5.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.31%

-7.07%

-1.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.07%

-20.90%

+1.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.62%

-20.90%

-4.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.91%

-25.45%

-10.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.78%

-1.92%

+0.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.74%

-7.45%

+2.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.06%

1.98%

+0.08%

Volatility

XDPG.L vs. SPX5.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers S&P 500 UCITS ETF 2C - GBP Hedged (XDPG.L) and SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPX5.L) have volatilities of 2.99% and 2.93%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDPG.LSPX5.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.99%

2.93%

+0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.34%

7.80%

+1.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.11%

10.97%

+1.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.06%

14.30%

+1.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.55%

15.41%

+1.14%

XDPG.L vs. SPX5.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDPG.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than SPX5.L's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XDPG.L vs. SPX5.L - Dividend Comparison

XDPG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPX5.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPX5.L
SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF
0.93%0.98%1.03%1.21%1.39%0.98%1.40%1.48%0.78%1.19%1.49%1.68%
XDPG.L
Xtrackers S&P 500 UCITS ETF 2C - GBP Hedged
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XDPG.L and SPX5.L have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SPX5.L is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPX5.L is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for XDPG.L.

XDPG.L tracks S&P 500 GBP Hedged, while SPX5.L tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for XDPG.L and 0.03% for SPX5.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDPG.L and SPX5.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer