XDPG.L vs. SPX5.L
XDPG.L (Xtrackers S&P 500 UCITS ETF 2C - GBP Hedged) and SPX5.L (SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF) are both S&P 500 funds - XDPG.L tracks the S&P 500 GBP Hedged while SPX5.L tracks the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XDPG.L returned 13.16%/yr vs 14.33%/yr for SPX5.L. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XDPG.L charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SPX5.L.
Performance
XDPG.L vs. SPX5.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XDPG.L is traded in GBp, while SPX5.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the SPX5.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XDPG.L achieves a 8.53% return, which is significantly lower than SPX5.L's 9.06% return. Over the past 10 years, XDPG.L has underperformed SPX5.L with an annualized return of 13.16%, while SPX5.L has yielded a comparatively higher 14.33% annualized return.
XDPG.L
- 1D
- -1.21%
- 1M
- -0.51%
- 6M
- 7.58%
- YTD
- 8.53%
- 1Y
- 19.27%
- 3Y*
- 18.73%
- 5Y*
- 11.48%
- 10Y*
- 13.16%
SPX5.L
- 1D
- -0.98%
- 1M
- -0.94%
- 6M
- 7.51%
- YTD
- 9.06%
- 1Y
- 19.65%
- 3Y*
- 18.28%
- 5Y*
- 13.33%
- 10Y*
- 14.33%
XDPG.L vs. SPX5.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDPG.L Xtrackers S&P 500 UCITS ETF 2C - GBP Hedged | 8.53% | 16.95% | 24.90% | 24.82% | -20.73% | 28.87% | 15.23% | 27.53% | -7.58% | 19.92% |
SPX5.L SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF | 9.06% | 9.34% | 27.46% | 19.76% | -9.00% | 30.96% | 13.52% | 26.33% | -0.90% | 10.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDPG.L and SPX5.L is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2015 | 0.76 |
The correlation between XDPG.L and SPX5.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
XDPG.L vs. SPX5.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XDPG.L
SPX5.L
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
XDPG.L
SPX5.L
Financial Services
XDPG.L
SPX5.L
Communication Services
XDPG.L
SPX5.L
Consumer Cyclical
XDPG.L
SPX5.L
Healthcare
XDPG.L
SPX5.L
Industrials
XDPG.L
SPX5.L
Consumer Defensive
XDPG.L
SPX5.L
Energy
XDPG.L
SPX5.L
Utilities
XDPG.L
SPX5.L
Real Estate
XDPG.L
SPX5.L
Basic Materials
XDPG.L
SPX5.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDPG.L vs. SPX5.L — Risk / Return Rank
XDPG.L
SPX5.L
XDPG.L vs. SPX5.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P 500 UCITS ETF 2C - GBP Hedged (XDPG.L) and SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPX5.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XDPG.L | SPX5.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.33 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.31 | 2.77 | -0.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.32 | 9.88 | -0.56 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XDPG.L vs. SPX5.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDPG.L drawdown since its inception was -35.91%, smaller than the maximum SPX5.L drawdown of -41.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDPG.L and SPX5.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDPG.L | SPX5.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.91% | -41.23% | +5.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.31% | -7.07% | -1.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.07% | -20.90% | +1.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.62% | -20.90% | -4.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.91% | -25.45% | -10.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.78% | -1.92% | +0.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.74% | -7.45% | +2.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.06% | 1.98% | +0.08% |
Volatility
XDPG.L vs. SPX5.L - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers S&P 500 UCITS ETF 2C - GBP Hedged (XDPG.L) and SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPX5.L) have volatilities of 2.99% and 2.93%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDPG.L | SPX5.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.99% | 2.93% | +0.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.34% | 7.80% | +1.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.11% | 10.97% | +1.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.06% | 14.30% | +1.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.55% | 15.41% | +1.14% |
XDPG.L vs. SPX5.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDPG.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than SPX5.L's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XDPG.L vs. SPX5.L - Dividend Comparison
XDPG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPX5.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPX5.L SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF | 0.93% | 0.98% | 1.03% | 1.21% | 1.39% | 0.98% | 1.40% | 1.48% | 0.78% | 1.19% | 1.49% | 1.68% |
XDPG.L Xtrackers S&P 500 UCITS ETF 2C - GBP Hedged | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XDPG.L and SPX5.L have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPX5.L is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPX5.L is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for XDPG.L.
XDPG.L tracks S&P 500 GBP Hedged, while SPX5.L tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for XDPG.L and 0.03% for SPX5.L.
Find the right allocation for XDPG.L and SPX5.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer