XDPG.L vs. SPLW.L
XDPG.L (Xtrackers S&P 500 UCITS ETF 2C - GBP Hedged) and SPLW.L (Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility UCITS ETF Acc) are both S&P 500 funds - XDPG.L tracks the S&P 500 GBP Hedged while SPLW.L tracks the S&P 500 Low Vol NTR Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XDPG.L returned 21.39%/yr vs 4.58%/yr for SPLW.L. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XDPG.L charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for SPLW.L.
Performance
XDPG.L vs. SPLW.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XDPG.L is traded in GBp, while SPLW.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SPLW.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XDPG.L achieves a 9.91% return, which is significantly higher than SPLW.L's 1.40% return.
XDPG.L
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 4.52%
- YTD
- 9.91%
- 6M
- 10.64%
- 1Y
- 27.07%
- 3Y*
- 21.39%
- 5Y*
- 12.48%
- 10Y*
- 13.60%
SPLW.L
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- -1.08%
- YTD
- 1.40%
- 6M
- 0.83%
- 1Y
- 1.38%
- 3Y*
- 4.58%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XDPG.L vs. SPLW.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDPG.L Xtrackers S&P 500 UCITS ETF 2C - GBP Hedged | 9.91% | 16.95% | 24.90% | 24.82% | -20.73% | 9.30% |
SPLW.L Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility UCITS ETF Acc | 1.40% | -2.66% | 15.44% | -5.47% | 7.10% | 13.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDPG.L and SPLW.L is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2021 | 0.27 |
The correlation between XDPG.L and SPLW.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.27 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XDPG.L vs. SPLW.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XDPG.L
SPLW.L
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
XDPG.L
SPLW.L
Financial Services
XDPG.L
SPLW.L
Communication Services
XDPG.L
SPLW.L
Consumer Cyclical
XDPG.L
SPLW.L
Healthcare
XDPG.L
SPLW.L
Industrials
XDPG.L
SPLW.L
Consumer Defensive
XDPG.L
SPLW.L
Energy
XDPG.L
SPLW.L
Utilities
XDPG.L
SPLW.L
Real Estate
XDPG.L
SPLW.L
Basic Materials
XDPG.L
SPLW.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDPG.L vs. SPLW.L — Risk / Return Rank
XDPG.L
SPLW.L
XDPG.L vs. SPLW.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P 500 UCITS ETF 2C - GBP Hedged (XDPG.L) and Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility UCITS ETF Acc (SPLW.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XDPG.L | SPLW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.03 | +0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.24 | 0.18 | +3.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.93 | 0.45 | +13.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XDPG.L | SPLW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.32 | 0.12 | +2.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.82 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.74 | 0.43 | +0.31 |
Drawdowns
XDPG.L vs. SPLW.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDPG.L drawdown since its inception was -35.91%, which is greater than SPLW.L's maximum drawdown of -14.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDPG.L and SPLW.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDPG.L | SPLW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.91% | -14.28% | -21.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.31% | -7.56% | -0.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.07% | -10.82% | -8.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.62% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.91% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.53% | -7.04% | +6.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.80% | -5.84% | +1.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.94% | 3.03% | -1.09% |
Volatility
XDPG.L vs. SPLW.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers S&P 500 UCITS ETF 2C - GBP Hedged (XDPG.L) is 3.18%, while Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility UCITS ETF Acc (SPLW.L) has a volatility of 3.98%. This indicates that XDPG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPLW.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDPG.L | SPLW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.18% | 3.98% | -0.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.59% | 8.70% | -0.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.62% | 11.19% | +0.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.00% | 12.99% | +3.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.60% | 12.99% | +3.61% |
XDPG.L vs. SPLW.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDPG.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than SPLW.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XDPG.L vs. SPLW.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XDPG.L nor SPLW.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XDPG.L and SPLW.L have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XDPG.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDPG.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for SPLW.L.
XDPG.L tracks S&P 500 GBP Hedged, while SPLW.L tracks S&P 500 Low Vol NTR Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for XDPG.L and 0.25% for SPLW.L.
Find the right allocation for XDPG.L and SPLW.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer