XDOC vs. PBFB
XDOC (Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated ETF - October) and PBFB (PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - February) are both Options Trading funds. Both are actively managed. XDOC charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for PBFB.
Performance
XDOC vs. PBFB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
XDOC
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PBFB
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 1.70%
- YTD
- 4.68%
- 6M
- 5.66%
- 1Y
- 13.63%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XDOC vs. PBFB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
XDOC Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated ETF - October | 0.00% |
PBFB PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - February | 3.76% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDOC vs. PBFB — Risk / Return Rank
XDOC
PBFB
XDOC vs. PBFB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated ETF - October (XDOC) and PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - February (PBFB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XDOC | PBFB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.87 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 1.67 | — |
Drawdowns
XDOC vs. PBFB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDOC drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum PBFB drawdown of -8.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDOC and PBFB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDOC | PBFB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -8.65% | +8.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -3.79% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.15% | +0.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -0.60% | +0.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.71% | — |
Volatility
XDOC vs. PBFB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDOC | PBFB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.75% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 3.71% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00% | 4.77% | -4.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 6.39% | -6.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 6.39% | -6.39% |
XDOC vs. PBFB - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDOC has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than PBFB's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
XDOC vs. PBFB - Dividend Comparison
Neither XDOC nor PBFB has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, PBFB is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PBFB is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for XDOC.
XDOC and PBFB have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Innovator and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for XDOC and 0.50% for PBFB.
Find the right allocation for XDOC and PBFB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer