XDOC vs. OCTT
XDOC (Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated ETF - October) and OCTT (AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Oct ETF) are both Options Trading funds. Both are actively managed. XDOC charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for OCTT.
Performance
XDOC vs. OCTT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
XDOC
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OCTT
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 2.77%
- YTD
- 6.89%
- 6M
- 7.45%
- 1Y
- 19.21%
- 3Y*
- 14.15%
- 5Y*
- 10.41%
- 10Y*
- —
XDOC vs. OCTT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
XDOC Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated ETF - October | 0.00% |
OCTT AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Oct ETF | 5.86% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDOC vs. OCTT — Risk / Return Rank
XDOC
OCTT
XDOC vs. OCTT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated ETF - October (XDOC) and AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Oct ETF (OCTT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XDOC | OCTT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.49 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.00 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 1.14 | — |
Drawdowns
XDOC vs. OCTT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDOC drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum OCTT drawdown of -13.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDOC and OCTT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDOC | OCTT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -13.49% | +13.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -5.81% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.04% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -13.49% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.24% | +0.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -2.03% | +2.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.17% | — |
Volatility
XDOC vs. OCTT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDOC | OCTT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.27% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 5.94% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00% | 7.77% | -7.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 10.43% | -10.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 10.22% | -10.22% |
XDOC vs. OCTT - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDOC has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than OCTT's 0.74% expense ratio.
Dividends
XDOC vs. OCTT - Dividend Comparison
Neither XDOC nor OCTT has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, OCTT is cheaper at 0.74% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
OCTT is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for XDOC.
XDOC and OCTT have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Allianz. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for XDOC and 0.74% for OCTT.
Find the right allocation for XDOC and OCTT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer