PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDOC vs. BUFC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDOC vs. BUFC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated ETF - October (XDOC) and AB Conservative Buffer ETF (BUFC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


XDOC

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BUFC

1D
0.02%
1M
1.58%
YTD
2.84%
6M
3.28%
1Y
8.86%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDOC vs. BUFC - Yearly Performance Comparison


XDOC vs. BUFC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XDOC
BUFC

Technology

35.4%
33.6%

Financial Services

13.3%
12.5%

Consumer Cyclical

10.7%
10.1%

Communication Services

10.6%
10.5%

Healthcare

8.7%
9.6%

Industrials

7.5%
8.6%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
5.3%

Energy

3.0%
3.4%

Utilities

2.4%
2.5%

Real Estate

1.9%
2.0%

Basic Materials

1.6%
1.9%

Technology

XDOC
35.4%
BUFC
33.6%

Financial Services

XDOC
13.3%
BUFC
12.5%

Consumer Cyclical

XDOC
10.7%
BUFC
10.1%

Communication Services

XDOC
10.6%
BUFC
10.5%

Healthcare

XDOC
8.7%
BUFC
9.6%

Industrials

XDOC
7.5%
BUFC
8.6%

Consumer Defensive

XDOC
4.9%
BUFC
5.3%

Energy

XDOC
3.0%
BUFC
3.4%

Utilities

XDOC
2.4%
BUFC
2.5%

Real Estate

XDOC
1.9%
BUFC
2.0%

Basic Materials

XDOC
1.6%
BUFC
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDOC vs. BUFC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDOC

BUFC
BUFC Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
BUFC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUFC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUFC Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
BUFC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUFC Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDOC vs. BUFC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated ETF - October (XDOC) and AB Conservative Buffer ETF (BUFC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

XDOC vs. BUFC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XDOCBUFCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.42

Drawdowns

XDOC vs. BUFC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDOC drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum BUFC drawdown of -8.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDOC and BUFC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDOCBUFCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-8.29%

+8.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.12%

+0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-0.76%

+0.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.85%

Volatility

XDOC vs. BUFC - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDOCBUFCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.00%

4.25%

-4.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.00%

5.64%

-5.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.00%

5.64%

-5.64%

XDOC vs. BUFC - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDOC has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than BUFC's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

XDOC vs. BUFC - Dividend Comparison

Neither XDOC nor BUFC has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, BUFC is cheaper at 0.69% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BUFC is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for XDOC.

XDOC and BUFC have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and AllianceBernstein. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for XDOC and 0.69% for BUFC.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDOC and BUFC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer