XDNS.L vs. JARI.L
XDNS.L (Xtrackers MSCI Japan ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1D) and JARI.L (Amundi Index MSCI Japan SRI PAB UCITS ETF DR (C)) are both Japan Equities funds tracking the TOPIX TR JPY, from DWS and Amundi respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XDNS.L returned 9.38%/yr vs 1.63%/yr for JARI.L. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XDNS.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for JARI.L.
Performance
XDNS.L vs. JARI.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XDNS.L achieves a 15.48% return, which is significantly higher than JARI.L's 2.58% return.
XDNS.L
- 1D
- -0.57%
- 1M
- 6.27%
- YTD
- 15.48%
- 6M
- 14.59%
- 1Y
- 32.42%
- 3Y*
- 14.60%
- 5Y*
- 9.38%
- 10Y*
- 9.68%
JARI.L
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- 4.23%
- YTD
- 2.58%
- 6M
- 1.49%
- 1Y
- 12.60%
- 3Y*
- 1.77%
- 5Y*
- 1.63%
- 10Y*
- —
XDNS.L vs. JARI.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDNS.L Xtrackers MSCI Japan ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1D | 15.48% | 16.58% | 9.87% | 11.58% | -7.42% | -2.86% |
JARI.L Amundi Index MSCI Japan SRI PAB UCITS ETF DR (C) | 2.58% | 10.15% | -2.37% | 5.00% | -10.79% | -1.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDNS.L and JARI.L is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 16, 2021 | 0.61 |
The correlation between XDNS.L and JARI.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (all time) to 0.77 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XDNS.L vs. JARI.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XDNS.L
JARI.L
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Utilities
-
Energy
-
-
Industrials
XDNS.L
JARI.L
Technology
XDNS.L
JARI.L
Financial Services
XDNS.L
JARI.L
Consumer Cyclical
XDNS.L
JARI.L
Communication Services
XDNS.L
JARI.L
Healthcare
XDNS.L
JARI.L
Basic Materials
XDNS.L
JARI.L
Consumer Defensive
XDNS.L
JARI.L
Real Estate
XDNS.L
JARI.L
Utilities
XDNS.L
JARI.L
-
Energy
XDNS.L
-
JARI.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDNS.L vs. JARI.L — Risk / Return Rank
XDNS.L
JARI.L
XDNS.L vs. JARI.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Japan ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1D (XDNS.L) and Amundi Index MSCI Japan SRI PAB UCITS ETF DR (C) (JARI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XDNS.L | JARI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.14 | +0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.81 | 1.20 | +2.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.43 | 3.31 | +8.13 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XDNS.L | JARI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.09 | 0.72 | +1.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 | 0.12 | +0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 0.02 | +0.58 |
Drawdowns
XDNS.L vs. JARI.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDNS.L drawdown since its inception was -24.75%, which is greater than JARI.L's maximum drawdown of -22.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDNS.L and JARI.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDNS.L | JARI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.75% | -22.78% | -1.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.70% | -10.47% | -0.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.32% | -14.89% | +0.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.29% | -22.78% | +3.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -24.75% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.57% | -4.56% | +3.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.35% | -12.30% | +6.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.04% | 3.80% | +0.24% |
Volatility
XDNS.L vs. JARI.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI Japan ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1D (XDNS.L) is 3.89%, while Amundi Index MSCI Japan SRI PAB UCITS ETF DR (C) (JARI.L) has a volatility of 4.18%. This indicates that XDNS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JARI.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDNS.L | JARI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.89% | 4.18% | -0.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.64% | 13.96% | +0.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.56% | 17.35% | +2.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.83% | 17.35% | +0.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.31% | 17.73% | -0.42% |
XDNS.L vs. JARI.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDNS.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than JARI.L's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XDNS.L vs. JARI.L - Dividend Comparison
XDNS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%, while JARI.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JARI.L Amundi Index MSCI Japan SRI PAB UCITS ETF DR (C) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XDNS.L Xtrackers MSCI Japan ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1D | 1.43% | 1.63% | 1.65% | 1.81% | 2.83% | 1.46% | 1.79% | 1.77% | 1.20% | 1.97% | 0.64% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XDNS.L and JARI.L have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XDNS.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDNS.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for JARI.L.
Both ETFs track TOPIX TR JPY. They also come from different issuers: DWS and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for XDNS.L and 0.18% for JARI.L.
Find the right allocation for XDNS.L and JARI.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer