XDN0.DE vs. XNAS.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XDN0.DE (Xtrackers MSCI Nordic UCITS ETF 1D) and XNAS.DE (Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - XDN0.DE is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI Nordic Countries NR EUR, while XNAS.DE is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq 100®. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XDN0.DE returned 5.54%/yr vs 18.79%/yr for XNAS.DE. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XDN0.DE charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for XNAS.DE.

Performance

XDN0.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Nordic UCITS ETF 1D (XDN0.DE) and Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAS.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDN0.DE achieves a 8.65% return, which is significantly lower than XNAS.DE's 20.53% return.

XDN0.DE

• 1D: 0.46%
• 1M: 2.62%
• YTD: 8.65%
• 6M: 12.79%
• 1Y: 11.58%
• 3Y*: 8.43%
• 5Y*: 5.54%
• 10Y*: 8.74%

XNAS.DE

• 1D: -0.83%
• 1M: 9.23%
• YTD: 20.53%
• 6M: 19.39%
• 1Y: 37.85%
• 3Y*: 24.64%
• 5Y*: 18.79%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDN0.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
XDN0.DE Xtrackers MSCI Nordic UCITS ETF 1D	8.65%	7.27%	-1.40%	16.42%	-11.37%	26.27%
XNAS.DE Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C	20.53%	7.11%	33.75%	51.36%	-29.99%	33.56%

Correlation

The correlation between XDN0.DE and XNAS.DE is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.48
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.45
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.53
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2021	0.54

The correlation between XDN0.DE and XNAS.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.45 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

XDN0.DE vs. XNAS.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDN0.DE

XDN0.DE Risk / Return Rank: 22
XDN0.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
XDN0.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
XDN0.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 21
XDN0.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
XDN0.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 23

XNAS.DE

XNAS.DE Risk / Return Rank: 71
XNAS.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
XNAS.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
XNAS.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 71
XNAS.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
XNAS.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDN0.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Nordic UCITS ETF 1D (XDN0.DE) and Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XDN0.DE	XNAS.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.72	2.40	-1.68
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.07	3.18	-2.11
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	1.42	-0.29
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.10	3.77	-2.66
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.83	11.16	-8.34
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XDN0.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDN0.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.72, which is lower than the XNAS.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDN0.DE and XNAS.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XDN0.DE	XNAS.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.72	2.40	-1.68
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.31	0.93	-0.62
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.51	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.51	0.91	-0.40

Drawdowns

XDN0.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDN0.DE drawdown since its inception was -32.67%, roughly equal to the maximum XNAS.DE drawdown of -31.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDN0.DE and XNAS.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	XDN0.DE	XNAS.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.67%	-31.25%	-1.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.44%	-10.00%	-0.44%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.41%	-26.72%	+0.31%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.41%	-31.25%	+4.84%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.67%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.63%	-0.83%	-0.80%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.52%	-7.83%	+1.31%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.09%	3.38%	+0.71%

Volatility

XDN0.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI Nordic UCITS ETF 1D (XDN0.DE) and Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAS.DE) have volatilities of 4.36% and 4.31%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XDN0.DE	XNAS.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.36%	4.31%	+0.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.02%	10.91%	+1.11%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.03%	15.71%	+0.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.47%	19.88%	-2.41%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.08%	19.84%	-2.76%

XDN0.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDN0.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than XNAS.DE's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

XDN0.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Dividend Comparison

XDN0.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.49%, while XNAS.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
XDN0.DE Xtrackers MSCI Nordic UCITS ETF 1D	2.49%	2.84%	2.76%	2.54%	4.77%	1.05%	4.85%	4.09%	1.09%	2.45%	1.64%
XNAS.DE Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XDN0.DE and XNAS.DE in my portfolio?

XDN0.DE and XNAS.DE have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XDN0.DE or XNAS.DE?

On fees, XNAS.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XDN0.DE or XNAS.DE?

XNAS.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for XDN0.DE.

What is the main difference between XDN0.DE and XNAS.DE?

XDN0.DE is categorized as Europe Equities, while XNAS.DE is Nasdaq-100. XDN0.DE tracks MSCI Nordic Countries NR EUR, while XNAS.DE tracks Nasdaq 100®. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for XDN0.DE and 0.20% for XNAS.DE.