PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
XDJP.L vs. XNAS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

XDJP.L vs. XNAS.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XDJP.L (Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D) and XNAS.L (Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XDJP.L is a Japan Equities fund tracking the TOPIX TR JPY, while XNAS.L is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XDJP.L returned 20.95%/yr vs 25.15%/yr for XNAS.L. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XDJP.L charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for XNAS.L.

Performance

XDJP.L vs. XNAS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D (XDJP.L) and Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XNAS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XDJP.L is traded in GBp, while XNAS.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XNAS.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDJP.L achieves a 31.98% return, which is significantly higher than XNAS.L's 20.93% return.

XDJP.L

1D
-1.35%
1M
10.95%
YTD
31.98%
6M
29.24%
1Y
64.30%
3Y*
20.95%
5Y*
12.61%
10Y*
13.14%

XNAS.L

1D
0.00%
1M
10.24%
YTD
20.93%
6M
19.10%
1Y
42.68%
3Y*
25.15%
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDJP.L vs. XNAS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XDJP.L
Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D		31.98%21.04%9.67%15.52%1.05%
XNAS.L
Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF		20.16%11.29%28.81%48.59%-8.32%

Correlation

The correlation between XDJP.L and XNAS.L is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2022

0.54

The correlation between XDJP.L and XNAS.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

XDJP.L vs. XNAS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
XDJP.L
XNAS.L

Technology

31.9%
53.7%

Industrials

19.4%
3.1%

Consumer Cyclical

16.9%
12.2%

Communication Services

12.4%
15.8%

Healthcare

6.7%
4.2%

Basic Materials

4.3%
1.1%

Consumer Defensive

3.3%
7.7%

Financial Services

3.1%
0.2%

Real Estate

1.5%
0.1%

Energy

0.3%
0.6%

Utilities

0.2%
1.4%

Technology

XDJP.L
31.9%
XNAS.L
53.7%

Industrials

XDJP.L
19.4%
XNAS.L
3.1%

Consumer Cyclical

XDJP.L
16.9%
XNAS.L
12.2%

Communication Services

XDJP.L
12.4%
XNAS.L
15.8%

Healthcare

XDJP.L
6.7%
XNAS.L
4.2%

Basic Materials

XDJP.L
4.3%
XNAS.L
1.1%

Consumer Defensive

XDJP.L
3.3%
XNAS.L
7.7%

Financial Services

XDJP.L
3.1%
XNAS.L
0.2%

Real Estate

XDJP.L
1.5%
XNAS.L
0.1%

Energy

XDJP.L
0.3%
XNAS.L
0.6%

Utilities

XDJP.L
0.2%
XNAS.L
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D

Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF

Often compared with XDJP.L:
XDJP.L vs. CNKY.LXDJP.L vs. VJPN.LXDJP.L vs. DXJXDJP.L vs. DXJG.LXDJP.L vs. PRIJ.LXDJP.L vs. CSJP.LXDJP.L vs. JPJP.L
Often compared with XNAS.L:
XNAS.L vs. CNDX.LXNAS.L vs. SXRV.DEXNAS.L vs. QQQMXNAS.L vs. EQQQ.LXNAS.L vs. CSNDX.MIXNAS.L vs. CNX1.LXNAS.L vs. NESG.L

Return for Risk

XDJP.L vs. XNAS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
XDJP.L
XDJP.L Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
XDJP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDJP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDJP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
XDJP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDJP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
XNAS.L
XNAS.L Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
XNAS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XNAS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
XNAS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
XNAS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
XNAS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDJP.L vs. XNAS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D (XDJP.L) and Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XNAS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

XDJP.LXNAS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.85
2.68

+0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.94
3.56

+0.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.48

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.77

3.82

+0.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.50

10.85

+3.65

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XDJP.L vs. XNAS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDJP.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.85, which is comparable to the XNAS.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDJP.L and XNAS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

XDJP.LXNAS.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.85

2.68

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.75

1.41

-0.66

Drawdowns

XDJP.L vs. XNAS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDJP.L drawdown since its inception was -23.69%, roughly equal to the maximum XNAS.L drawdown of -24.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDJP.L and XNAS.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

XDJP.LXNAS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.69%

-24.49%

+0.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.40%

-11.08%

-2.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.82%

-24.49%

+5.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.61%

—

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.69%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.35%

0.00%

-1.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.79%

-3.85%

-2.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.42%

3.91%

+0.51%

Volatility

XDJP.L vs. XNAS.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D (XDJP.L) has a higher volatility of 6.75% compared to Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XNAS.L) at 4.93%. This indicates that XDJP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XNAS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

XDJP.LXNAS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.75%

4.93%

+1.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.68%

11.49%

+6.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.44%

15.78%

+6.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.72%

18.98%

-1.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.63%

18.98%

-1.35%

XDJP.L vs. XNAS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDJP.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than XNAS.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

XDJP.L vs. XNAS.L - Dividend Comparison

XDJP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, while XNAS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XDJP.L
Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D		1.04%1.33%1.41%1.59%2.47%1.20%1.11%1.13%1.24%0.72%0.83%0.16%
XNAS.L
Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

XDJP.L and XNAS.L have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XDJP.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDJP.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XNAS.L.

XDJP.L is categorized as Japan Equities, while XNAS.L is Nasdaq-100. XDJP.L tracks TOPIX TR JPY, while XNAS.L tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for XDJP.L and 0.20% for XNAS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDJP.L and XNAS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer