PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDJP.L vs. XDWT.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDJP.L vs. XDWT.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D (XDJP.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF 1C (XDWT.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XDJP.L is traded in GBp, while XDWT.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XDWT.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDJP.L achieves a 31.98% return, which is significantly higher than XDWT.L's 24.60% return. Over the past 10 years, XDJP.L has underperformed XDWT.L with an annualized return of 13.14%, while XDWT.L has yielded a comparatively higher 25.21% annualized return.


XDJP.L

1D
-1.35%
1M
10.95%
YTD
31.98%
6M
29.24%
1Y
64.30%
3Y*
20.95%
5Y*
12.61%
10Y*
13.14%

XDWT.L

1D
-1.87%
1M
14.96%
YTD
24.60%
6M
22.74%
1Y
52.87%
3Y*
29.51%
5Y*
22.68%
10Y*
25.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDJP.L vs. XDWT.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XDJP.L
Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D
31.98%21.04%9.67%15.52%-10.26%-3.79%21.77%16.58%-3.53%14.73%
XDWT.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF 1C
24.60%13.70%36.24%47.09%-23.22%31.09%40.22%40.71%2.60%25.81%

Correlation

The correlation between XDJP.L and XDWT.L is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 25, 2016

0.60

The correlation between XDJP.L and XDWT.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

XDJP.L vs. XDWT.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XDJP.L
XDWT.L

Technology

31.9%
99.1%

Industrials

19.4%
0.3%

Consumer Cyclical

16.9%

-

Communication Services

12.4%
0.6%

Healthcare

6.7%
0.1%

Basic Materials

4.3%

-

Consumer Defensive

3.3%

-

Financial Services

3.1%
0.1%

Real Estate

1.5%

-

Energy

0.3%
0.1%

Utilities

0.2%

-

Technology

XDJP.L
31.9%
XDWT.L
99.1%

Industrials

XDJP.L
19.4%
XDWT.L
0.3%

Consumer Cyclical

XDJP.L
16.9%
XDWT.L

-

Communication Services

XDJP.L
12.4%
XDWT.L
0.6%

Healthcare

XDJP.L
6.7%
XDWT.L
0.1%

Basic Materials

XDJP.L
4.3%
XDWT.L

-

Consumer Defensive

XDJP.L
3.3%
XDWT.L

-

Financial Services

XDJP.L
3.1%
XDWT.L
0.1%

Real Estate

XDJP.L
1.5%
XDWT.L

-

Energy

XDJP.L
0.3%
XDWT.L
0.1%

Utilities

XDJP.L
0.2%
XDWT.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDJP.L vs. XDWT.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDJP.L
XDJP.L Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
XDJP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDJP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDJP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
XDJP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDJP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

XDWT.L
XDWT.L Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
XDWT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDWT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDWT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
XDWT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDWT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDJP.L vs. XDWT.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D (XDJP.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF 1C (XDWT.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XDJP.LXDWT.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.43

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.77

3.13

+1.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.50

7.96

+6.54

XDJP.L vs. XDWT.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDJP.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.85, which is comparable to the XDWT.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDJP.L and XDWT.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XDJP.LXDWT.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.85

2.60

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

1.00

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

1.16

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.75

1.16

-0.41

Drawdowns

XDJP.L vs. XDWT.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDJP.L drawdown since its inception was -23.69%, smaller than the maximum XDWT.L drawdown of -27.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDJP.L and XDWT.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDJP.LXDWT.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.69%

-27.95%

+4.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.40%

-16.79%

+3.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.82%

-27.95%

+9.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.61%

-27.95%

+7.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.69%

-27.95%

+4.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.35%

-2.32%

+0.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.79%

-5.64%

-1.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.42%

6.62%

-2.20%

Volatility

XDJP.L vs. XDWT.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D (XDJP.L) is 6.75%, while Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF 1C (XDWT.L) has a volatility of 7.48%. This indicates that XDJP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDWT.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDJP.LXDWT.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.75%

7.48%

-0.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.68%

15.35%

+2.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.44%

20.26%

+2.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.72%

22.66%

-4.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.63%

21.96%

-4.33%

XDJP.L vs. XDWT.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDJP.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than XDWT.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XDJP.L vs. XDWT.L - Dividend Comparison

XDJP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, while XDWT.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XDJP.L
Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D
1.04%1.33%1.41%1.59%2.47%1.20%1.11%1.13%1.24%0.72%0.83%0.16%
XDWT.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XDJP.L and XDWT.L have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XDJP.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDJP.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XDWT.L.

XDJP.L is categorized as Japan Equities, while XDWT.L is Technology Equities. XDJP.L tracks TOPIX TR JPY, while XDWT.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for XDJP.L and 0.25% for XDWT.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDJP.L and XDWT.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer