XDJP.L vs. XDBG.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XDJP.L (Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D) and XDBG.L (Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity ex-Agriculture & Livestock Swap UCITS ETF 3C GBP Hedged) are both exchange-traded funds - XDJP.L is a Japan Equities fund tracking the TOPIX TR JPY, while XDBG.L is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg ex-Agriculture and Livestock 15/30 Capped 3 Month Forward (GBP Hedged). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XDJP.L returned 13.14%/yr vs 8.57%/yr for XDBG.L. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XDJP.L charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for XDBG.L.

Performance

XDJP.L vs. XDBG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D (XDJP.L) and Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity ex-Agriculture & Livestock Swap UCITS ETF 3C GBP Hedged (XDBG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDJP.L achieves a 31.98% return, which is significantly higher than XDBG.L's 23.03% return. Over the past 10 years, XDJP.L has outperformed XDBG.L with an annualized return of 13.14%, while XDBG.L has yielded a comparatively lower 8.57% annualized return.

XDJP.L

• 1D: -1.35%
• 1M: 7.60%
• YTD: 31.98%
• 6M: 29.24%
• 1Y: 65.08%
• 3Y*: 20.95%
• 5Y*: 12.61%
• 10Y*: 13.14%

XDBG.L

• 1D: -0.42%
• 1M: 1.82%
• YTD: 23.03%
• 6M: 24.44%
• 1Y: 43.55%
• 3Y*: 18.96%
• 5Y*: 14.38%
• 10Y*: 8.57%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDJP.L vs. XDBG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
XDJP.L Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D	31.98%	21.04%	9.67%	15.52%	-10.26%	-3.79%	21.77%	16.58%	-3.53%	14.73%
XDBG.L Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity ex-Agriculture & Livestock Swap UCITS ETF 3C GBP Hedged	23.03%	25.68%	8.15%	-11.18%	18.13%	38.25%	-3.17%	5.10%	-12.92%	4.24%

Correlation

The correlation between XDJP.L and XDBG.L is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.01
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.09
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.14
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.15
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2013	0.13

The correlation between XDJP.L and XDBG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.01 (1 year) to 0.15 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XDJP.L vs. XDBG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XDJP.L	XDBG.L
Technology	31.9%	36.3%
Industrials	19.4%	10.6%
Consumer Cyclical	16.9%	4.9%
Communication Services	12.4%	17.2%
Healthcare	6.7%	4.0%
Basic Materials	4.3%	4.0%
Consumer Defensive	3.3%	11.8%
Financial Services	3.1%	5.2%
Real Estate	1.5%	2.8%
Energy	0.3%	3.1%
Utilities	0.2%	1.1%

Return for Risk

XDJP.L vs. XDBG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDJP.L

XDJP.L Risk / Return Rank: 84
XDJP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
XDJP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
XDJP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 81
XDJP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
XDJP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 77

XDBG.L

XDBG.L Risk / Return Rank: 76
XDBG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
XDBG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
XDBG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 77
XDBG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
XDBG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDJP.L vs. XDBG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D (XDJP.L) and Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity ex-Agriculture & Livestock Swap UCITS ETF 3C GBP Hedged (XDBG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XDJP.L	XDBG.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.85	2.52	+0.34
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.94	3.02	+0.92
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.48	1.45	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.77	4.77	0.00
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.50	13.39	+1.12
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XDJP.L vs. XDBG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDJP.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.85, which is comparable to the XDBG.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDJP.L and XDBG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XDJP.L	XDBG.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.85	2.52	+0.34
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.71	0.76	-0.05
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.78	0.53	+0.24
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.75	0.08	+0.67

Drawdowns

XDJP.L vs. XDBG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDJP.L drawdown since its inception was -23.69%, smaller than the maximum XDBG.L drawdown of -64.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDJP.L and XDBG.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	XDJP.L	XDBG.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.69%	-64.69%	+41.00%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.40%	-9.36%	-4.04%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.82%	-13.02%	-5.80%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.61%	-28.67%	+8.06%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-23.69%	-37.06%	+13.37%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.35%	-2.78%	+1.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.79%	-35.22%	+28.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.42%	3.34%	+1.08%

Volatility

XDJP.L vs. XDBG.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D (XDJP.L) has a higher volatility of 6.75% compared to Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity ex-Agriculture & Livestock Swap UCITS ETF 3C GBP Hedged (XDBG.L) at 4.24%. This indicates that XDJP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDBG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XDJP.L	XDBG.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.75%	4.24%	+2.51%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.68%	15.16%	+2.52%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.44%	17.76%	+4.68%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.72%	18.95%	-1.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.63%	16.01%	+1.62%

XDJP.L vs. XDBG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDJP.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than XDBG.L's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

XDJP.L vs. XDBG.L - Dividend Comparison

XDJP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, while XDBG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
XDBG.L Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity ex-Agriculture & Livestock Swap UCITS ETF 3C GBP Hedged	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XDJP.L Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D	1.04%	1.33%	1.41%	1.59%	2.47%	1.20%	1.11%	1.13%	1.24%	0.72%	0.83%	0.16%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XDJP.L and XDBG.L in my portfolio?

XDJP.L and XDBG.L have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XDJP.L or XDBG.L?

On fees, XDJP.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XDJP.L or XDBG.L?

XDJP.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for XDBG.L.

What is the main difference between XDJP.L and XDBG.L?

XDJP.L is categorized as Japan Equities, while XDBG.L is Commodities. XDJP.L tracks TOPIX TR JPY, while XDBG.L tracks Bloomberg ex-Agriculture and Livestock 15/30 Capped 3 Month Forward (GBP Hedged). Their fees differ too: 0.09% for XDJP.L and 0.39% for XDBG.L.