XDJP.L vs. FJPS.L
XDJP.L (Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D) and FJPS.L (Fidelity Sustainable Research Enhanced Japan Equity UCITS ETF Acc) are both Japan Equities funds tracking the TOPIX TR JPY, from Xtrackers and FIL Investment Management (Luxembourg) S.A., Irela respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XDJP.L returned 12.61%/yr vs 10.03%/yr for FJPS.L. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XDJP.L charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for FJPS.L.
Performance
XDJP.L vs. FJPS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XDJP.L is traded in GBp, while FJPS.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the FJPS.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XDJP.L achieves a 31.98% return, which is significantly higher than FJPS.L's 16.69% return.
XDJP.L
- 1D
- -1.35%
- 1M
- 10.95%
- YTD
- 31.98%
- 6M
- 29.24%
- 1Y
- 64.30%
- 3Y*
- 20.95%
- 5Y*
- 12.61%
- 10Y*
- 13.14%
FJPS.L
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- 7.52%
- YTD
- 16.69%
- 6M
- 15.62%
- 1Y
- 33.78%
- 3Y*
- 14.39%
- 5Y*
- 10.03%
- 10Y*
- —
XDJP.L vs. FJPS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDJP.L Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D | 31.98% | 21.04% | 9.67% | 15.52% | -10.26% | -3.79% | 2.47% |
FJPS.L Fidelity Sustainable Research Enhanced Japan Equity UCITS ETF Acc | 16.69% | 14.84% | 8.88% | 12.32% | -5.11% | 2.90% | 1.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDJP.L and FJPS.L is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2020 | 0.89 |
The correlation between XDJP.L and FJPS.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
XDJP.L vs. FJPS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XDJP.L
FJPS.L
Technology
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Financial Services
Real Estate
Energy
Utilities
Technology
XDJP.L
FJPS.L
Industrials
XDJP.L
FJPS.L
Consumer Cyclical
XDJP.L
FJPS.L
Communication Services
XDJP.L
FJPS.L
Healthcare
XDJP.L
FJPS.L
Basic Materials
XDJP.L
FJPS.L
Consumer Defensive
XDJP.L
FJPS.L
Financial Services
XDJP.L
FJPS.L
Real Estate
XDJP.L
FJPS.L
Energy
XDJP.L
FJPS.L
Utilities
XDJP.L
FJPS.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDJP.L vs. FJPS.L — Risk / Return Rank
XDJP.L
FJPS.L
XDJP.L vs. FJPS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D (XDJP.L) and Fidelity Sustainable Research Enhanced Japan Equity UCITS ETF Acc (FJPS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XDJP.L | FJPS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.34 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.77 | 3.20 | +1.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.50 | 10.51 | +3.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XDJP.L | FJPS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.85 | 1.83 | +1.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 | 0.62 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.78 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.75 | 0.59 | +0.16 |
Drawdowns
XDJP.L vs. FJPS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDJP.L drawdown since its inception was -23.69%, which is greater than FJPS.L's maximum drawdown of -17.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDJP.L and FJPS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDJP.L | FJPS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.69% | -17.38% | -6.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.40% | -10.50% | -2.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.82% | -15.34% | -3.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.61% | -17.38% | -3.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.69% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.35% | 0.00% | -1.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.79% | -5.17% | -1.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.42% | 3.20% | +1.22% |
Volatility
XDJP.L vs. FJPS.L - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D (XDJP.L) has a higher volatility of 6.75% compared to Fidelity Sustainable Research Enhanced Japan Equity UCITS ETF Acc (FJPS.L) at 4.30%. This indicates that XDJP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FJPS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDJP.L | FJPS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.75% | 4.30% | +2.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.68% | 15.08% | +2.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.44% | 18.44% | +4.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.72% | 16.10% | +1.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.63% | 15.90% | +1.73% |
XDJP.L vs. FJPS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDJP.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than FJPS.L's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
XDJP.L vs. FJPS.L - Dividend Comparison
XDJP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, while FJPS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FJPS.L Fidelity Sustainable Research Enhanced Japan Equity UCITS ETF Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XDJP.L Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D | 1.04% | 1.33% | 1.41% | 1.59% | 2.47% | 1.20% | 1.11% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 0.72% | 0.83% | 0.16% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XDJP.L and FJPS.L have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XDJP.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDJP.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for FJPS.L.
Both ETFs track TOPIX TR JPY. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and FIL Investment Management (Luxembourg) S.A., Irela. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for XDJP.L and 0.30% for FJPS.L.
Find the right allocation for XDJP.L and FJPS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer