PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDIV vs. XDTE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDIV vs. XDTE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill S&P 500 No Dividend Target ETF (XDIV) and Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (XDTE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDIV achieves a 9.11% return, which is significantly higher than XDTE's 8.17% return.


XDIV

1D
-1.01%
1M
0.46%
6M
7.68%
YTD
9.11%
1Y
19.58%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XDTE

1D
-1.03%
1M
0.85%
6M
6.39%
YTD
8.17%
1Y
18.41%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDIV vs. XDTE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XDIV and XDTE is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2025

0.94

The correlation between XDIV and XDTE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

XDIV vs. XDTE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XDIV
XDTE

Technology

39.0%
39.0%

Financial Services

11.1%
11.1%

Communication Services

10.6%
10.6%

Consumer Cyclical

9.9%
9.9%

Healthcare

8.3%
8.3%

Industrials

7.8%
7.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.5%
4.5%

Energy

3.1%
3.1%

Utilities

2.1%
2.1%

Real Estate

1.8%
1.8%

Basic Materials

1.7%
1.7%

Technology

XDIV
39.0%
XDTE
39.0%

Financial Services

XDIV
11.1%
XDTE
11.1%

Communication Services

XDIV
10.6%
XDTE
10.6%

Consumer Cyclical

XDIV
9.9%
XDTE
9.9%

Healthcare

XDIV
8.3%
XDTE
8.3%

Industrials

XDIV
7.8%
XDTE
7.8%

Consumer Defensive

XDIV
4.5%
XDTE
4.5%

Energy

XDIV
3.1%
XDTE
3.1%

Utilities

XDIV
2.1%
XDTE
2.1%

Real Estate

XDIV
1.8%
XDTE
1.8%

Basic Materials

XDIV
1.7%
XDTE
1.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDIV vs. XDTE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDIV
XDIV Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
XDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
XDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

XDTE
XDTE Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
XDTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDTE Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
XDTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDTE Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDIV vs. XDTE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill S&P 500 No Dividend Target ETF (XDIV) and Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (XDTE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XDIVXDTEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.29

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.15

2.41

-0.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.42

10.34

-0.92

XDIV vs. XDTE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDIV Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is comparable to the XDTE Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDIV and XDTE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XDIV vs. XDTE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDIV drawdown since its inception was -9.16%, smaller than the maximum XDTE drawdown of -19.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDIV and XDTE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDIVXDTEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.16%

-19.09%

+9.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.16%

-7.68%

-1.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.03%

-1.47%

-0.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.27%

-2.27%

+1.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.08%

1.78%

+0.30%

Volatility

XDIV vs. XDTE - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill S&P 500 No Dividend Target ETF (XDIV) and Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (XDTE) have volatilities of 3.34% and 3.28%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDIVXDTEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.34%

3.28%

+0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.24%

9.25%

+0.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.75%

11.67%

+1.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.63%

13.86%

-1.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.63%

13.86%

-1.23%

XDIV vs. XDTE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDIV has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than XDTE's 0.97% expense ratio.


Dividends

XDIV vs. XDTE - Dividend Comparison

XDIV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XDTE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 32.88%.


PositionTTM20252024
XDIV
Roundhill S&P 500 No Dividend Target ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%
XDTE
Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF
32.88%39.16%20.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, XDIV and XDTE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

XDIV has higher volatility (3.34%) compared to XDTE (3.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XDIV dropped -9.16% vs XDTE's -19.09%.

On 1-year performance, XDIV leads with 19.58% vs 18.41% for XDTE. On fees, XDIV is cheaper at 0.08% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, XDIV has performed better with a 19.58% return vs 18.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XDIV is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for XDTE.

XDTE has the higher dividend yield at 32.88%, compared with 0.00% for XDIV.

XDIV is categorized as S&P 500, while XDTE is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XDIV and 0.97% for XDTE.

XDTE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDIV and XDTE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer