PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDIV vs. UMAX.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XDIV vs. UMAX.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill S&P 500 No Dividend Target ETF (XDIV) and Hamilton Utilities YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (UMAX.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XDIV vs. UMAX.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Different Trading Currencies

XDIV is traded in USD, while UMAX.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the UMAX.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDIV achieves a -4.00% return, which is significantly lower than UMAX.TO's 4.72% return.


XDIV

1D
0.45%
1M
-4.31%
YTD
-4.00%
6M
-1.57%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

UMAX.TO

1D
0.00%
1M
-3.30%
YTD
4.72%
6M
6.87%
1Y
15.93%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XDIV vs. UMAX.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDIV has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than UMAX.TO's 0.65% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

XDIV vs. UMAX.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDIV

UMAX.TO
UMAX.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
UMAX.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UMAX.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
UMAX.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
UMAX.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
UMAX.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDIV vs. UMAX.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill S&P 500 No Dividend Target ETF (XDIV) and Hamilton Utilities YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (UMAX.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

XDIV vs. UMAX.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XDIVUMAX.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

0.57

+0.04

Correlation

The correlation between XDIV and UMAX.TO is 0.12, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

XDIV vs. UMAX.TO - Dividend Comparison

XDIV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UMAX.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.26%.


TTM202520242023
XDIV
Roundhill S&P 500 No Dividend Target ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UMAX.TO
Hamilton Utilities YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF
14.26%14.86%14.81%6.96%

Drawdowns

XDIV vs. UMAX.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDIV drawdown since its inception was -9.16%, smaller than the maximum UMAX.TO drawdown of -13.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDIV and UMAX.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


XDIVUMAX.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.16%

-10.09%

+0.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.76%

-1.83%

-3.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.29%

-2.05%

+0.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.35%

Volatility

XDIV vs. UMAX.TO - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


XDIVUMAX.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.58%

9.81%

+2.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.58%

11.02%

+1.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.58%

11.02%

+1.56%