PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDIV vs. PMFB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDIV vs. PMFB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill S&P 500 No Dividend Target ETF (XDIV) and PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - February (PMFB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDIV achieves a 8.01% return, which is significantly higher than PMFB's 2.39% return.


XDIV

1D
-1.37%
1M
-1.30%
YTD
8.01%
6M
7.28%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PMFB

1D
-0.13%
1M
0.06%
YTD
2.39%
6M
2.46%
1Y
7.42%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDIV vs. PMFB - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XDIV and PMFB is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2025

0.88

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDIV vs. PMFB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDIV

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


PMFB
PMFB Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
PMFB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PMFB Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
PMFB Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
PMFB Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
PMFB Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDIV vs. PMFB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill S&P 500 No Dividend Target ETF (XDIV) and PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - February (PMFB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XDIVPMFBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.78

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

28.39

XDIV vs. PMFB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XDIV vs. PMFB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDIV drawdown since its inception was -9.16%, which is greater than PMFB's maximum drawdown of -2.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDIV and PMFB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDIVPMFBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.16%

-2.94%

-6.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.02%

-0.27%

-2.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.25%

-0.36%

-0.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.26%

Volatility

XDIV vs. PMFB - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDIVPMFBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.86%

2.14%

+10.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.86%

2.76%

+10.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.86%

2.76%

+10.10%

XDIV vs. PMFB - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDIV has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than PMFB's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

XDIV vs. PMFB - Dividend Comparison

Neither XDIV nor PMFB has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XDIV and PMFB have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XDIV is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDIV is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for PMFB.

XDIV and PMFB have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

XDIV is categorized as S&P 500, while PMFB is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XDIV and 0.50% for PMFB.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDIV and PMFB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer