PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDIV vs. MMKT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDIV vs. MMKT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill S&P 500 No Dividend Target ETF (XDIV) and Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF (MMKT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDIV achieves a 8.01% return, which is significantly higher than MMKT's 1.64% return.


XDIV

1D
-1.37%
1M
-1.30%
YTD
8.01%
6M
7.28%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MMKT

1D
0.02%
1M
0.27%
YTD
1.64%
6M
1.74%
1Y
3.78%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDIV vs. MMKT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XDIV and MMKT is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2025

-0.12

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDIV vs. MMKT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDIV

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


MMKT
MMKT Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
MMKT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MMKT Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
MMKT Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
MMKT Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
MMKT Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDIV vs. MMKT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill S&P 500 No Dividend Target ETF (XDIV) and Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF (MMKT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XDIVMMKTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

15.48

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

152.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

912.59

XDIV vs. MMKT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XDIV vs. MMKT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDIV drawdown since its inception was -9.16%, which is greater than MMKT's maximum drawdown of -0.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDIV and MMKT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDIVMMKTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.16%

-0.04%

-9.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.02%

0.00%

-3.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.25%

-0.00%

-1.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.00%

Volatility

XDIV vs. MMKT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDIVMMKTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.86%

0.23%

+12.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.86%

0.23%

+12.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.86%

0.23%

+12.63%

XDIV vs. MMKT - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDIV has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than MMKT's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XDIV vs. MMKT - Dividend Comparison

XDIV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MMKT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.71%.


PositionTTM20252024
MMKT
Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF
3.71%3.98%1.07%
XDIV
Roundhill S&P 500 No Dividend Target ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XDIV and MMKT have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XDIV is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDIV is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for MMKT.

MMKT has the higher dividend yield at 3.71%, compared with 0.00% for XDIV.

XDIV is categorized as S&P 500, while MMKT is Money Market. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Texas Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XDIV and 0.20% for MMKT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDIV and MMKT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer