XDIV vs. FDVV
XDIV (Roundhill S&P 500 No Dividend Target ETF) and FDVV (Fidelity High Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XDIV is a S&P 500 fund actively managed by Roundhill, while FDVV is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Fidelity Core Dividend Index. XDIV is actively managed, while FDVV is passively managed. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XDIV charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for FDVV.
Performance
XDIV vs. FDVV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with XDIV having a 8.01% return and FDVV slightly higher at 8.39%.
XDIV
- 1D
- -1.37%
- 1M
- -1.30%
- YTD
- 8.01%
- 6M
- 7.28%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FDVV
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.43%
- YTD
- 8.39%
- 6M
- 8.10%
- 1Y
- 22.16%
- 3Y*
- 19.90%
- 5Y*
- 13.69%
- 10Y*
- —
XDIV vs. FDVV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XDIV Roundhill S&P 500 No Dividend Target ETF | 8.01% | 10.07% |
FDVV Fidelity High Dividend ETF | 8.39% | 8.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDIV and FDVV is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2025 | 0.79 |
XDIV vs. FDVV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XDIV
FDVV
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
-
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Technology
XDIV
FDVV
Financial Services
XDIV
FDVV
Communication Services
XDIV
FDVV
Consumer Cyclical
XDIV
FDVV
Healthcare
XDIV
FDVV
Industrials
XDIV
FDVV
Consumer Defensive
XDIV
FDVV
Energy
XDIV
FDVV
-
Utilities
XDIV
FDVV
Real Estate
XDIV
FDVV
Basic Materials
XDIV
FDVV
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDIV vs. FDVV — Risk / Return Rank
XDIV
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FDVV
XDIV vs. FDVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill S&P 500 No Dividend Target ETF (XDIV) and Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XDIV | FDVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.40 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.39 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 9.89 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XDIV vs. FDVV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDIV drawdown since its inception was -9.16%, smaller than the maximum FDVV drawdown of -40.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDIV and FDVV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDIV | FDVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.16% | -40.25% | +31.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -15.90% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -20.18% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.02% | -1.31% | -1.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.25% | -3.79% | +2.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.24% | — |
Volatility
XDIV vs. FDVV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDIV | FDVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.09% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.26% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.86% | 10.15% | +2.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.86% | 14.73% | -1.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.86% | 16.97% | -4.11% |
XDIV vs. FDVV - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDIV has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than FDVV's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
XDIV vs. FDVV - Dividend Comparison
XDIV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FDVV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.86%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDVV Fidelity High Dividend ETF | 2.86% | 2.89% | 2.94% | 3.77% | 3.44% | 2.70% | 3.19% | 3.93% | 4.05% | 3.66% | 1.04% |
XDIV Roundhill S&P 500 No Dividend Target ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XDIV and FDVV have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XDIV is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDIV is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for FDVV.
FDVV has the higher dividend yield at 2.86%, compared with 0.00% for XDIV.
XDIV is categorized as S&P 500, while FDVV is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XDIV and 0.29% for FDVV.
Find the right allocation for XDIV and FDVV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer