XDIV vs. DBC
XDIV (Roundhill S&P 500 No Dividend Target ETF) and DBC (Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - XDIV is a S&P 500 fund actively managed by Roundhill, while DBC is a Commodities fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Index Excess Return. XDIV is actively managed, while DBC is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.11, they often move in opposite directions. XDIV charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for DBC.
Performance
XDIV vs. DBC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XDIV achieves a 10.63% return, which is significantly lower than DBC's 35.47% return.
XDIV
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- 5.14%
- YTD
- 10.63%
- 6M
- 10.83%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DBC
- 1D
- 0.56%
- 1M
- -3.32%
- YTD
- 35.47%
- 6M
- 35.36%
- 1Y
- 45.90%
- 3Y*
- 15.09%
- 5Y*
- 12.78%
- 10Y*
- 9.10%
XDIV vs. DBC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XDIV Roundhill S&P 500 No Dividend Target ETF | 10.63% | 9.90% |
DBC Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund | 35.47% | 4.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDIV and DBC is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2025 | -0.11 |
XDIV vs. DBC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XDIV
DBC
Technology
-
Financial Services
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
XDIV
DBC
-
Financial Services
XDIV
DBC
Communication Services
XDIV
DBC
-
Consumer Cyclical
XDIV
DBC
-
Healthcare
XDIV
DBC
-
Industrials
XDIV
DBC
-
Consumer Defensive
XDIV
DBC
-
Energy
XDIV
DBC
-
Utilities
XDIV
DBC
-
Real Estate
XDIV
DBC
-
Basic Materials
XDIV
DBC
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDIV vs. DBC — Risk / Return Rank
XDIV
DBC
XDIV vs. DBC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill S&P 500 No Dividend Target ETF (XDIV) and Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund (DBC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XDIV | DBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.47 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.67 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.51 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.98 | 0.12 | +1.86 |
Drawdowns
XDIV vs. DBC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDIV drawdown since its inception was -9.16%, smaller than the maximum DBC drawdown of -76.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDIV and DBC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDIV | DBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.16% | -76.36% | +67.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.05% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.82% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.34% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.71% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.67% | -21.64% | +20.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.20% | -46.22% | +45.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.31% | — |
Volatility
XDIV vs. DBC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDIV | DBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.45% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 15.75% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.31% | 18.68% | -6.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.31% | 19.18% | -6.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.31% | 17.81% | -5.50% |
XDIV vs. DBC - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDIV has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than DBC's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
XDIV vs. DBC - Dividend Comparison
XDIV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DBC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.46%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBC Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund | 2.46% | 3.33% | 5.22% | 4.94% | 0.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.59% | 1.30% |
XDIV Roundhill S&P 500 No Dividend Target ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XDIV and DBC have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XDIV is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDIV is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DBC.
DBC has the higher dividend yield at 2.46%, compared with 0.00% for XDIV.
XDIV is categorized as S&P 500, while DBC is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for XDIV and 0.85% for DBC.
Find the right allocation for XDIV and DBC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer