XDG7.DE vs. WREE.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XDG7.DE (Xtrackers MSCI Global SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy UCITS ETF 1C) and WREE.L (WisdomTree Strategic Metals and Rare Earths Miners UCITS ETF USD Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - XDG7.DE is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI IMI SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy Select, while WREE.L is a Commodity Producers Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree Strategic Metals and Rare Earths Miners Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, XDG7.DE returned 73.03% vs 106.52% for WREE.L. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XDG7.DE charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for WREE.L.

Performance

XDG7.DE vs. WREE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Global SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDG7.DE) and WisdomTree Strategic Metals and Rare Earths Miners UCITS ETF USD Acc (WREE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

XDG7.DE is traded in EUR, while WREE.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the WREE.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDG7.DE achieves a 34.27% return, which is significantly higher than WREE.L's 17.79% return.

XDG7.DE

• 1D: -2.33%
• 1M: 2.34%
• YTD: 34.27%
• 6M: 33.11%
• 1Y: 73.03%
• 3Y*: 4.63%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

WREE.L

• 1D: -1.21%
• 1M: -8.07%
• YTD: 17.79%
• 6M: 28.07%
• 1Y: 106.52%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDG7.DE vs. WREE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
XDG7.DE Xtrackers MSCI Global SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy UCITS ETF 1C	34.27%	23.57%	-6.87%
WREE.L WisdomTree Strategic Metals and Rare Earths Miners UCITS ETF USD Acc	17.81%	89.88%	-6.91%

Correlation

The correlation between XDG7.DE and WREE.L is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.51
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2024	0.55

The correlation between XDG7.DE and WREE.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

XDG7.DE vs. WREE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDG7.DE

XDG7.DE Risk / Return Rank: 76
XDG7.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
XDG7.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
XDG7.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 89
XDG7.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
XDG7.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 62

WREE.L

WREE.L Risk / Return Rank: 82
WREE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
WREE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
WREE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 75
WREE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
WREE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDG7.DE vs. WREE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Global SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDG7.DE) and WisdomTree Strategic Metals and Rare Earths Miners UCITS ETF USD Acc (WREE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XDG7.DE	WREE.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.40	2.86	-0.45
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.25	3.25	0.00
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.56	1.42	+0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.19	4.69	-0.50
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.86	15.61	-4.75
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XDG7.DE vs. WREE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDG7.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.40, which is comparable to the WREE.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDG7.DE and WREE.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XDG7.DE	WREE.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.40	2.86	-0.45
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.06	1.31	-1.25

Drawdowns

XDG7.DE vs. WREE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDG7.DE drawdown since its inception was -48.68%, which is greater than WREE.L's maximum drawdown of -26.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDG7.DE and WREE.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	XDG7.DE	WREE.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-48.68%	-26.45%	-22.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.21%	-22.60%	+5.39%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-43.66%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.95%	-12.60%	+9.65%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-26.59%	-7.91%	-18.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.64%	6.80%	-0.16%

Volatility

XDG7.DE vs. WREE.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI Global SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDG7.DE) is 7.88%, while WisdomTree Strategic Metals and Rare Earths Miners UCITS ETF USD Acc (WREE.L) has a volatility of 13.88%. This indicates that XDG7.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WREE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XDG7.DE	WREE.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.88%	13.88%	-6.00%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.49%	30.22%	-16.73%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	30.00%	37.17%	-7.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.08%	30.93%	-6.85%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.08%	30.93%	-6.85%

XDG7.DE vs. WREE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDG7.DE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than WREE.L's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

XDG7.DE vs. WREE.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XDG7.DE nor WREE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XDG7.DE and WREE.L in my portfolio?

XDG7.DE and WREE.L have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XDG7.DE or WREE.L?

On fees, XDG7.DE is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XDG7.DE or WREE.L?

XDG7.DE is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for WREE.L.

What is the main difference between XDG7.DE and WREE.L?

XDG7.DE is categorized as Energy Equities, while WREE.L is Commodity Producers Equities. XDG7.DE tracks MSCI ACWI IMI SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy Select, while WREE.L tracks WisdomTree Strategic Metals and Rare Earths Miners Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XDG7.DE and 0.50% for WREE.L.