XDG3.DE vs. XDEQ.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XDG3.DE (Xtrackers MSCI Global SDG 3 Good Health UCITS ETF 1C) and XDEQ.DE (Xtrackers MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - XDG3.DE is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI IMI SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being Select, while XDEQ.DE is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XDG3.DE returned 1.94%/yr vs 15.18%/yr for XDEQ.DE. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XDG3.DE charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for XDEQ.DE.

Performance

XDG3.DE vs. XDEQ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Global SDG 3 Good Health UCITS ETF 1C (XDG3.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEQ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDG3.DE achieves a -6.02% return, which is significantly lower than XDEQ.DE's 9.48% return.

XDG3.DE

• 1D: 2.88%
• 1M: 2.53%
• YTD: -6.02%
• 6M: -6.54%
• 1Y: 2.67%
• 3Y*: 1.94%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XDEQ.DE

• 1D: 0.79%
• 1M: 3.10%
• YTD: 9.48%
• 6M: 9.63%
• 1Y: 19.01%
• 3Y*: 15.18%
• 5Y*: 11.42%
• 10Y*: 12.38%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDG3.DE vs. XDEQ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
XDG3.DE Xtrackers MSCI Global SDG 3 Good Health UCITS ETF 1C	-6.02%	1.47%	9.58%	2.52%
XDEQ.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF 1C	9.48%	2.87%	23.81%	15.02%

Correlation

The correlation between XDG3.DE and XDEQ.DE is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.51
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.56
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2023	0.57

The correlation between XDG3.DE and XDEQ.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

XDG3.DE vs. XDEQ.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDG3.DE

XDG3.DE Risk / Return Rank: 11
XDG3.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
XDG3.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
XDG3.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 11
XDG3.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
XDG3.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 11

XDEQ.DE

XDEQ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 58
XDEQ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
XDEQ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
XDEQ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 55
XDEQ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
XDEQ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDG3.DE vs. XDEQ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Global SDG 3 Good Health UCITS ETF 1C (XDG3.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEQ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XDG3.DE	XDEQ.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.16	1.78	-1.62
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.35	2.56	-2.21
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.04	1.34	-0.30
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.17	3.04	-2.87
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.44	12.17	-11.73
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XDG3.DE vs. XDEQ.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDG3.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.16, which is lower than the XDEQ.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDG3.DE and XDEQ.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XDG3.DE	XDEQ.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.16	1.78	-1.62
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.80	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.85	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.16	0.80	-0.64

Drawdowns

XDG3.DE vs. XDEQ.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDG3.DE drawdown since its inception was -20.49%, smaller than the maximum XDEQ.DE drawdown of -32.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDG3.DE and XDEQ.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	XDG3.DE	XDEQ.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.49%	-32.16%	+11.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.31%	-6.22%	-7.09%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.49%	-20.59%	+0.10%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-20.59%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-32.16%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.91%	0.00%	-11.91%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.57%	-4.75%	-0.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.29%	1.56%	+3.73%

Volatility

XDG3.DE vs. XDEQ.DE - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI Global SDG 3 Good Health UCITS ETF 1C (XDG3.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.95% compared to Xtrackers MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEQ.DE) at 2.36%. This indicates that XDG3.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDEQ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XDG3.DE	XDEQ.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.95%	2.36%	+2.59%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.56%	7.32%	+3.24%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.57%	10.64%	+3.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.31%	14.12%	-0.81%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.31%	15.35%	-2.04%

XDG3.DE vs. XDEQ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDG3.DE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than XDEQ.DE's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

XDG3.DE vs. XDEQ.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither XDG3.DE nor XDEQ.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XDG3.DE and XDEQ.DE in my portfolio?

XDG3.DE and XDEQ.DE have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XDG3.DE or XDEQ.DE?

On fees, XDEQ.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XDG3.DE or XDEQ.DE?

XDEQ.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XDG3.DE.

What is the main difference between XDG3.DE and XDEQ.DE?

XDG3.DE is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while XDEQ.DE is Global Equities. XDG3.DE tracks MSCI ACWI IMI SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being Select, while XDEQ.DE tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XDG3.DE and 0.25% for XDEQ.DE.