XDG3.DE vs. DXSE.DE
XDG3.DE (Xtrackers MSCI Global SDG 3 Good Health UCITS ETF 1C) and DXSE.DE (Xtrackers MSCI Europe Health Care ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds from Xtrackers - XDG3.DE tracks the MSCI ACWI IMI SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being Select while DXSE.DE tracks the MSCI Europe Health Care ESG Screened 20-35. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XDG3.DE returned 1.94%/yr vs 2.51%/yr for DXSE.DE. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XDG3.DE charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for DXSE.DE.
Performance
XDG3.DE vs. DXSE.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XDG3.DE achieves a -6.02% return, which is significantly lower than DXSE.DE's -1.95% return.
XDG3.DE
- 1D
- 2.88%
- 1M
- 2.53%
- YTD
- -6.02%
- 6M
- -6.54%
- 1Y
- 2.67%
- 3Y*
- 1.94%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DXSE.DE
- 1D
- 2.90%
- 1M
- 0.52%
- YTD
- -1.95%
- 6M
- -0.32%
- 1Y
- 5.13%
- 3Y*
- 2.51%
- 5Y*
- 5.38%
- 10Y*
- 6.10%
XDG3.DE vs. DXSE.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
XDG3.DE Xtrackers MSCI Global SDG 3 Good Health UCITS ETF 1C | -6.02% | 1.47% | 9.58% | 2.52% |
DXSE.DE Xtrackers MSCI Europe Health Care ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C | -1.95% | 4.97% | 4.52% | 7.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDG3.DE and DXSE.DE is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2023 | 0.68 |
The correlation between XDG3.DE and DXSE.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDG3.DE vs. DXSE.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XDG3.DE
DXSE.DE
XDG3.DE vs. DXSE.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Global SDG 3 Good Health UCITS ETF 1C (XDG3.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Europe Health Care ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (DXSE.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XDG3.DE | DXSE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.06 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.17 | 0.38 | -0.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.44 | 0.82 | -0.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XDG3.DE | DXSE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 | 0.27 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.32 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.38 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.16 | 0.45 | -0.29 |
Drawdowns
XDG3.DE vs. DXSE.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDG3.DE drawdown since its inception was -20.49%, smaller than the maximum DXSE.DE drawdown of -34.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDG3.DE and DXSE.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDG3.DE | DXSE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.49% | -34.30% | +13.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.31% | -12.67% | -0.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.49% | -28.10% | +7.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -28.10% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -28.10% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.91% | -13.88% | +1.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.57% | -8.34% | +2.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.29% | 5.81% | -0.52% |
Volatility
XDG3.DE vs. DXSE.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI Global SDG 3 Good Health UCITS ETF 1C (XDG3.DE) is 4.95%, while Xtrackers MSCI Europe Health Care ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (DXSE.DE) has a volatility of 5.82%. This indicates that XDG3.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DXSE.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDG3.DE | DXSE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.95% | 5.82% | -0.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.56% | 11.95% | -1.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.57% | 17.63% | -3.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.31% | 16.48% | -3.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.31% | 16.04% | -2.73% |
XDG3.DE vs. DXSE.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDG3.DE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than DXSE.DE's 0.17% expense ratio.
Dividends
XDG3.DE vs. DXSE.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XDG3.DE nor DXSE.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XDG3.DE and DXSE.DE have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DXSE.DE is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DXSE.DE is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XDG3.DE.
XDG3.DE tracks MSCI ACWI IMI SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being Select, while DXSE.DE tracks MSCI Europe Health Care ESG Screened 20-35. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XDG3.DE and 0.17% for DXSE.DE.
Find the right allocation for XDG3.DE and DXSE.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer