XDG.TO vs. TEQT.TO
XDG.TO (iShares Core MSCI Global Quality Dividend Index ETF) and TEQT.TO (TD All-Equity ETF Portfolio) are both Global Equities funds - XDG.TO tracks the Morningstar Gbl GR CAD while TEQT.TO tracks the 25% Solactive Canada Broad Market Index (C$, Net Total Return); 55% Solactive US Large Cap CAD Index (C$, Net Total Return); 20% Solactive GBS Developed Markets ex. North America Large & Mid Cap CAD Index (C$, Net Total Return). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, XDG.TO returned 19.79% vs 29.82% for TEQT.TO. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XDG.TO charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for TEQT.TO.
Performance
XDG.TO vs. TEQT.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XDG.TO achieves a 9.07% return, which is significantly lower than TEQT.TO's 11.59% return.
XDG.TO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 3.72%
- YTD
- 9.07%
- 6M
- 8.39%
- 1Y
- 19.79%
- 3Y*
- 15.60%
- 5Y*
- 11.34%
- 10Y*
- —
TEQT.TO
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- 5.99%
- YTD
- 11.59%
- 6M
- 11.36%
- 1Y
- 29.82%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XDG.TO vs. TEQT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XDG.TO iShares Core MSCI Global Quality Dividend Index ETF | 9.07% | 14.02% |
TEQT.TO TD All-Equity ETF Portfolio | 11.59% | 27.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDG.TO and TEQT.TO is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2025 | 0.57 |
The correlation between XDG.TO and TEQT.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDG.TO vs. TEQT.TO — Risk / Return Rank
XDG.TO
TEQT.TO
XDG.TO vs. TEQT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Global Quality Dividend Index ETF (XDG.TO) and TD All-Equity ETF Portfolio (TEQT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XDG.TO | TEQT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.77 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.51 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.53 | 3.93 | -1.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.02 | 16.17 | -7.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XDG.TO | TEQT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.93 | 2.70 | -0.77 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.08 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.70 | 2.99 | -2.28 |
Drawdowns
XDG.TO vs. TEQT.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDG.TO drawdown since its inception was -27.08%, which is greater than TEQT.TO's maximum drawdown of -7.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDG.TO and TEQT.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDG.TO | TEQT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.08% | -7.62% | -19.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.87% | -7.62% | -0.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.33% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -12.33% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.95% | -0.45% | -1.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.92% | -1.00% | -1.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.20% | 1.85% | +0.35% |
Volatility
XDG.TO vs. TEQT.TO - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core MSCI Global Quality Dividend Index ETF (XDG.TO) and TD All-Equity ETF Portfolio (TEQT.TO) have volatilities of 3.12% and 3.03%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDG.TO | TEQT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.12% | 3.03% | +0.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.06% | 8.80% | -0.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.31% | 11.10% | -0.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.56% | 12.18% | -1.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.14% | 12.18% | +0.96% |
XDG.TO vs. TEQT.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDG.TO has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than TEQT.TO's 0.17% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XDG.TO vs. TEQT.TO - Dividend Comparison
XDG.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.82%, more than TEQT.TO's 1.31% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TEQT.TO TD All-Equity ETF Portfolio | 1.31% | 1.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XDG.TO iShares Core MSCI Global Quality Dividend Index ETF | 2.82% | 2.89% | 2.90% | 3.13% | 3.27% | 2.97% | 3.27% | 3.18% | 3.47% | 1.67% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XDG.TO and TEQT.TO have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TEQT.TO is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TEQT.TO is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for XDG.TO.
XDG.TO tracks Morningstar Gbl GR CAD, while TEQT.TO tracks 25% Solactive Canada Broad Market Index (C$, Net Total Return); 55% Solactive US Large Cap CAD Index (C$, Net Total Return); 20% Solactive GBS Developed Markets ex. North America Large & Mid Cap CAD Index (C$, Net Total Return). They also come from different issuers: iShares and TD. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for XDG.TO and 0.17% for TEQT.TO.
Find the right allocation for XDG.TO and TEQT.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer