PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
XDG.TO vs. ONEQ.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

XDG.TO vs. ONEQ.TO

Last updated Jul 18, 2026
Documentation

XDG.TO (iShares Core MSCI Global Quality Dividend Index ETF) and ONEQ.TO (CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF) are both Global Equities funds. XDG.TO is passively managed, while ONEQ.TO is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, XDG.TO returned 10.85%/yr vs 13.10%/yr for ONEQ.TO. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

XDG.TO vs. ONEQ.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares Core MSCI Global Quality Dividend Index ETF (XDG.TO) and CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF (ONEQ.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with XDG.TO having a 13.88% return and ONEQ.TO slightly higher at 13.96%.

XDG.TO

1D
-0.51%
1M
2.56%
6M
8.80%
YTD
13.88%
1Y
21.32%
3Y*
15.24%
5Y*
10.85%
10Y*
—

ONEQ.TO

1D
-1.11%
1M
0.37%
6M
9.99%
YTD
13.96%
1Y
25.20%
3Y*
20.30%
5Y*
13.10%
10Y*
11.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDG.TO vs. ONEQ.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XDG.TO
iShares Core MSCI Global Quality Dividend Index ETF		13.88%12.26%14.74%7.06%1.78%15.16%-1.68%17.32%0.95%2.14%
ONEQ.TO
CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF		13.96%17.62%22.45%19.07%-10.74%21.65%8.21%22.22%-10.36%7.61%

Correlation

The correlation between XDG.TO and ONEQ.TO is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2017

0.27

The correlation between XDG.TO and ONEQ.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (1 year) to 0.27 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XDG.TO vs. ONEQ.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
XDG.TO
ONEQ.TO

Healthcare

21.1%
5.4%

Consumer Defensive

14.5%
5.2%

Financial Services

13.7%
14.3%

Industrials

11.7%
9.8%

Energy

11.2%
9.8%

Consumer Cyclical

9.6%
7.1%

Technology

6.7%
30.9%

Utilities

5.8%
2.1%

Communication Services

3.2%
6.5%

Basic Materials

2.4%
6.0%

Real Estate

0.1%
3.0%

Healthcare

XDG.TO
21.1%
ONEQ.TO
5.4%

Consumer Defensive

XDG.TO
14.5%
ONEQ.TO
5.2%

Financial Services

XDG.TO
13.7%
ONEQ.TO
14.3%

Industrials

XDG.TO
11.7%
ONEQ.TO
9.8%

Energy

XDG.TO
11.2%
ONEQ.TO
9.8%

Consumer Cyclical

XDG.TO
9.6%
ONEQ.TO
7.1%

Technology

XDG.TO
6.7%
ONEQ.TO
30.9%

Utilities

XDG.TO
5.8%
ONEQ.TO
2.1%

Communication Services

XDG.TO
3.2%
ONEQ.TO
6.5%

Basic Materials

XDG.TO
2.4%
ONEQ.TO
6.0%

Real Estate

XDG.TO
0.1%
ONEQ.TO
3.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Core MSCI Global Quality Dividend Index ETF

CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF

Often compared with XDG.TO:
XDG.TO vs. XDIV.TOXDG.TO vs. XEQT.TOXDG.TO vs. XAW.TOXDG.TO vs. XDU.TOXDG.TO vs. XDGH.TOXDG.TO vs. CYH.TOXDG.TO vs. SCHD
Often compared with ONEQ.TO:
ONEQ.TO vs. VDU.TOONEQ.TO vs. XML.TOONEQ.TO vs. VVO.TOONEQ.TO vs. ESGG.TOONEQ.TO vs. GEQT.TOONEQ.TO vs. VMO.TOONEQ.TO vs. CEQT.TO

Return for Risk

XDG.TO vs. ONEQ.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
XDG.TO
XDG.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
XDG.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDG.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDG.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
XDG.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDG.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
ONEQ.TO
ONEQ.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
ONEQ.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ONEQ.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
ONEQ.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
ONEQ.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
ONEQ.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDG.TO vs. ONEQ.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Global Quality Dividend Index ETF (XDG.TO) and CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF (ONEQ.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

XDG.TOONEQ.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.93
2.11

-0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.76
3.08

-0.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.42

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.72

3.80

-1.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.40

16.75

-7.35

XDG.TO vs. ONEQ.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDG.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is comparable to the ONEQ.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDG.TO and ONEQ.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XDG.TO vs. ONEQ.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDG.TO drawdown since its inception was -27.08%, smaller than the maximum ONEQ.TO drawdown of -34.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDG.TO and ONEQ.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

XDG.TOONEQ.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.08%

-34.40%

+7.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.87%

-6.66%

-1.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.33%

-16.08%

+3.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.33%

-17.61%

+5.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-34.40%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.04%

-1.20%

-1.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.11%

-3.69%

+0.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.27%

1.51%

+0.76%

Volatility

XDG.TO vs. ONEQ.TO - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core MSCI Global Quality Dividend Index ETF (XDG.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.62% compared to CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF (ONEQ.TO) at 2.83%. This indicates that XDG.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ONEQ.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

XDG.TOONEQ.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.62%

2.83%

+1.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.02%

9.93%

-0.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.14%

12.03%

-0.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.26%

13.29%

-2.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.89%

13.91%

-0.02%

Dividends

XDG.TO vs. ONEQ.TO - Dividend Comparison

XDG.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.72%, more than ONEQ.TO's 1.60% yield.

PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
ONEQ.TO
CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF		1.60%1.60%1.05%1.53%1.38%0.89%1.22%1.39%0.94%1.03%1.22%
XDG.TO
iShares Core MSCI Global Quality Dividend Index ETF		2.72%2.92%2.96%3.13%3.27%2.97%3.27%3.18%3.47%1.67%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

XDG.TO and ONEQ.TO have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

They also come from different issuers: iShares and CI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDG.TO and ONEQ.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer