PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDEW.DE vs. MVOL.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDEW.DE vs. MVOL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1C (XDEW.DE) and iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS (MVOL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XDEW.DE is traded in EUR, while MVOL.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the MVOL.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDEW.DE achieves a 14.50% return, which is significantly higher than MVOL.L's 5.36% return. Over the past 10 years, XDEW.DE has outperformed MVOL.L with an annualized return of 11.04%, while MVOL.L has yielded a comparatively lower 6.43% annualized return.


XDEW.DE

1D
-0.34%
1M
2.42%
6M
9.75%
YTD
14.50%
1Y
20.12%
3Y*
12.62%
5Y*
9.52%
10Y*
11.04%

MVOL.L

1D
0.69%
1M
2.55%
6M
4.32%
YTD
5.36%
1Y
6.10%
3Y*
8.50%
5Y*
5.77%
10Y*
6.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDEW.DE vs. MVOL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XDEW.DE
Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1C
14.50%-0.46%18.66%10.08%-6.94%41.59%1.18%31.27%-4.53%4.00%
MVOL.L
iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS
5.36%-2.16%18.41%4.07%-4.02%23.22%-5.89%25.33%2.18%2.96%

Correlation

The correlation between XDEW.DE and MVOL.L is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2014

0.72

The correlation between XDEW.DE and MVOL.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (1 year) to 0.72 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDEW.DE vs. MVOL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDEW.DE
XDEW.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
XDEW.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDEW.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDEW.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
XDEW.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDEW.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

MVOL.L
MVOL.L Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
MVOL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MVOL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
MVOL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
MVOL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
MVOL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDEW.DE vs. MVOL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1C (XDEW.DE) and iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS (MVOL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XDEW.DEMVOL.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.12

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.91

1.16

+2.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.05

2.83

+9.22

XDEW.DE vs. MVOL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDEW.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is higher than the MVOL.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDEW.DE and MVOL.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XDEW.DE vs. MVOL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDEW.DE drawdown since its inception was -38.79%, which is greater than MVOL.L's maximum drawdown of -28.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDEW.DE and MVOL.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDEW.DEMVOL.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.79%

-28.24%

-10.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.06%

-5.24%

+0.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.70%

-11.81%

-10.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.70%

-12.55%

-10.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.79%

-28.24%

-10.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.61%

-3.38%

+2.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.33%

-4.59%

-0.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.65%

2.15%

-0.50%

Volatility

XDEW.DE vs. MVOL.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1C (XDEW.DE) and iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS (MVOL.L) have volatilities of 2.81% and 2.85%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDEW.DEMVOL.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.81%

2.85%

-0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.82%

6.90%

-0.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.43%

8.87%

+1.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.90%

10.75%

+4.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.80%

12.14%

+4.66%

XDEW.DE vs. MVOL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDEW.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than MVOL.L's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

XDEW.DE vs. MVOL.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XDEW.DE nor MVOL.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XDEW.DE and MVOL.L have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XDEW.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDEW.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for MVOL.L.

XDEW.DE is categorized as S&P 500, while MVOL.L is Global Equities. XDEW.DE tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index, while MVOL.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XDEW.DE and 0.35% for MVOL.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDEW.DE and MVOL.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer