PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDEW.DE vs. IBCK.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDEW.DE vs. IBCK.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1C (XDEW.DE) and iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF (Acc) (IBCK.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDEW.DE achieves a 10.39% return, which is significantly higher than IBCK.DE's 5.14% return. Over the past 10 years, XDEW.DE has outperformed IBCK.DE with an annualized return of 11.25%, while IBCK.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 10.32% annualized return.


XDEW.DE

1D
0.30%
1M
3.90%
YTD
10.39%
6M
10.29%
1Y
18.10%
3Y*
12.12%
5Y*
9.22%
10Y*
11.25%

IBCK.DE

1D
0.27%
1M
4.61%
YTD
5.14%
6M
5.32%
1Y
9.77%
3Y*
10.94%
5Y*
9.91%
10Y*
10.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDEW.DE vs. IBCK.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XDEW.DE
Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1C
10.39%-0.46%18.66%10.08%-6.94%41.59%1.18%31.25%-4.52%4.00%
IBCK.DE
iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF (Acc)
5.14%-0.69%25.61%6.20%-6.04%35.73%-2.18%34.85%-1.47%2.29%

Correlation

The correlation between XDEW.DE and IBCK.DE is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 18, 2014

0.87

The correlation between XDEW.DE and IBCK.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDEW.DE vs. IBCK.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDEW.DE
XDEW.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
XDEW.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDEW.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDEW.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
XDEW.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDEW.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

IBCK.DE
IBCK.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
IBCK.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBCK.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBCK.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
IBCK.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBCK.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDEW.DE vs. IBCK.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1C (XDEW.DE) and iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF (Acc) (IBCK.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XDEW.DEIBCK.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.19

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.51

1.83

+1.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.36

5.31

+5.05

XDEW.DE vs. IBCK.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDEW.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is higher than the IBCK.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDEW.DE and IBCK.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XDEW.DEIBCK.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.66

1.07

+0.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

0.79

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

0.73

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.68

0.88

-0.21

Drawdowns

XDEW.DE vs. IBCK.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDEW.DE drawdown since its inception was -38.79%, which is greater than IBCK.DE's maximum drawdown of -33.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDEW.DE and IBCK.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDEW.DEIBCK.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.79%

-33.11%

-5.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.06%

-5.08%

+0.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.70%

-17.55%

-5.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.70%

-17.55%

-5.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.79%

-33.11%

-5.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.47%

+0.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.39%

-4.50%

-0.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.72%

1.75%

-0.03%

Volatility

XDEW.DE vs. IBCK.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1C (XDEW.DE) is 2.06%, while iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF (Acc) (IBCK.DE) has a volatility of 2.26%. This indicates that XDEW.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBCK.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDEW.DEIBCK.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.06%

2.26%

-0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.75%

5.71%

+1.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.70%

8.73%

+1.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.89%

12.37%

+2.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.86%

14.02%

+2.84%

XDEW.DE vs. IBCK.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XDEW.DE and IBCK.DE have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XDEW.DE vs. IBCK.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither XDEW.DE nor IBCK.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XDEW.DE and IBCK.DE have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDEW.DE and IBCK.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.

XDEW.DE tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index, while IBCK.DE tracks S&P 500 Minimum Volatility. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDEW.DE and IBCK.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer