PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
XDEQ.L vs. XAUS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

XDEQ.L vs. XAUS.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XDEQ.L (Xtrackers MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF 1C) and XAUS.L (Xtrackers S&P/ASX 200 UCITS ETF 1D) are both exchange-traded funds - XDEQ.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD, while XAUS.L is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Australia NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XDEQ.L returned 13.78%/yr vs 9.17%/yr for XAUS.L. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XDEQ.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for XAUS.L.

Performance

XDEQ.L vs. XAUS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEQ.L) and Xtrackers S&P/ASX 200 UCITS ETF 1D (XAUS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDEQ.L achieves a 8.63% return, which is significantly higher than XAUS.L's 8.13% return. Over the past 10 years, XDEQ.L has outperformed XAUS.L with an annualized return of 13.78%, while XAUS.L has yielded a comparatively lower 9.17% annualized return.

XDEQ.L

1D
0.92%
1M
4.55%
YTD
8.63%
6M
9.20%
1Y
22.27%
3Y*
15.29%
5Y*
11.55%
10Y*
13.78%

XAUS.L

1D
-0.60%
1M
0.41%
YTD
8.13%
6M
9.60%
1Y
16.15%
3Y*
9.59%
5Y*
6.41%
10Y*
9.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDEQ.L vs. XAUS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XDEQ.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF 1C		8.63%7.52%18.91%19.22%-9.44%24.28%11.14%30.48%-5.16%12.25%
XAUS.L
Xtrackers S&P/ASX 200 UCITS ETF 1D		8.13%9.45%3.36%5.67%3.27%9.35%9.38%18.34%-8.52%9.19%

Correlation

The correlation between XDEQ.L and XAUS.L is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2014

0.46

The correlation between XDEQ.L and XAUS.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (all time) to 0.60 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XDEQ.L vs. XAUS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
XDEQ.L
XAUS.L

Technology

30.4%
2.5%

Financial Services

14.7%
34.8%

Industrials

10.1%
6.3%

Healthcare

9.2%
5.5%

Communication Services

9.1%
3.7%

Consumer Cyclical

8.9%
6.7%

Consumer Defensive

5.3%
3.6%

Energy

4.6%
5.0%

Basic Materials

3.2%
24.7%

Utilities

2.7%
1.5%

Real Estate

1.7%
5.8%

Technology

XDEQ.L
30.4%
XAUS.L
2.5%

Financial Services

XDEQ.L
14.7%
XAUS.L
34.8%

Industrials

XDEQ.L
10.1%
XAUS.L
6.3%

Healthcare

XDEQ.L
9.2%
XAUS.L
5.5%

Communication Services

XDEQ.L
9.1%
XAUS.L
3.7%

Consumer Cyclical

XDEQ.L
8.9%
XAUS.L
6.7%

Consumer Defensive

XDEQ.L
5.3%
XAUS.L
3.6%

Energy

XDEQ.L
4.6%
XAUS.L
5.0%

Basic Materials

XDEQ.L
3.2%
XAUS.L
24.7%

Utilities

XDEQ.L
2.7%
XAUS.L
1.5%

Real Estate

XDEQ.L
1.7%
XAUS.L
5.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Xtrackers MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF 1C

Xtrackers S&P/ASX 200 UCITS ETF 1D

Often compared with XDEQ.L:
XDEQ.L vs. IWQU.LXDEQ.L vs. VWCE.DEXDEQ.L vs. SWDA.LXDEQ.L vs. SPYXDEQ.L vs. XDEV.LXDEQ.L vs. GGRG.LXDEQ.L vs. HSJP.L
Often compared with XAUS.L:
XAUS.L vs. DX2S.DEXAUS.L vs. ^GSPCXAUS.L vs. GLDXAUS.L vs. VUSA.LXAUS.L vs. VOOXAUS.L vs. CNX1.LXAUS.L vs. FTAL.L

Return for Risk

XDEQ.L vs. XAUS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
XDEQ.L
XDEQ.L Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
XDEQ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDEQ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDEQ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
XDEQ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDEQ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
XAUS.L
XAUS.L Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
XAUS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XAUS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
XAUS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
XAUS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
XAUS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDEQ.L vs. XAUS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEQ.L) and Xtrackers S&P/ASX 200 UCITS ETF 1D (XAUS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

XDEQ.LXAUS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.26
1.27

+0.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.17
1.86

+1.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.23

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.21

1.72

+1.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.32

5.19

+8.13

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XDEQ.L vs. XAUS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDEQ.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.26, which is higher than the XAUS.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDEQ.L and XAUS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

XDEQ.LXAUS.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.26

1.27

+0.99

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

0.43

+0.45

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.13

0.55

+0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.21

0.38

+0.83

Drawdowns

XDEQ.L vs. XAUS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDEQ.L drawdown since its inception was -23.79%, smaller than the maximum XAUS.L drawdown of -51.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDEQ.L and XAUS.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

XDEQ.LXAUS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.79%

-51.15%

+27.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.90%

-9.57%

+2.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.96%

-21.54%

+3.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.96%

-21.54%

+3.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.79%

-38.31%

+14.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-4.18%

+4.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.78%

-8.06%

+4.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.67%

3.14%

-1.47%

Volatility

XDEQ.L vs. XAUS.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEQ.L) is 2.57%, while Xtrackers S&P/ASX 200 UCITS ETF 1D (XAUS.L) has a volatility of 4.33%. This indicates that XDEQ.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XAUS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

XDEQ.LXAUS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.57%

4.33%

-1.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.12%

10.24%

-3.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.81%

13.00%

-3.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.37%

16.76%

-3.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.89%

20.45%

-3.56%

XDEQ.L vs. XAUS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDEQ.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than XAUS.L's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

XDEQ.L vs. XAUS.L - Dividend Comparison

XDEQ.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XAUS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%.

PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
XAUS.L
Xtrackers S&P/ASX 200 UCITS ETF 1D		2.54%2.67%3.22%3.83%5.17%2.15%4.85%3.73%3.53%3.49%3.73%
XDEQ.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF 1C		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

XDEQ.L and XAUS.L have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XDEQ.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDEQ.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for XAUS.L.

XDEQ.L is categorized as Global Equities, while XAUS.L is Asia Pacific Equities. XDEQ.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while XAUS.L tracks MSCI Australia NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and DWS. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XDEQ.L and 0.50% for XAUS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDEQ.L and XAUS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer