XDEQ.L vs. IWDA.AS
XDEQ.L (Xtrackers MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF 1C) and IWDA.AS (iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Global Equities funds - XDEQ.L tracks the MSCI ACWI NR USD while IWDA.AS tracks the MSCI World Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XDEQ.L returned 13.79%/yr vs 14.21%/yr for IWDA.AS. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XDEQ.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for IWDA.AS.
Performance
XDEQ.L vs. IWDA.AS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XDEQ.L is traded in GBp, while IWDA.AS is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the IWDA.AS values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with XDEQ.L having a 9.92% return and IWDA.AS slightly higher at 10.40%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with XDEQ.L having a 13.79% annualized return and IWDA.AS not far ahead at 14.21%.
XDEQ.L
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 2.44%
- YTD
- 9.92%
- 6M
- 11.21%
- 1Y
- 23.58%
- 3Y*
- 15.68%
- 5Y*
- 11.43%
- 10Y*
- 13.79%
IWDA.AS
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 1.67%
- YTD
- 10.40%
- 6M
- 11.75%
- 1Y
- 26.58%
- 3Y*
- 17.68%
- 5Y*
- 12.68%
- 10Y*
- 14.21%
XDEQ.L vs. IWDA.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDEQ.L Xtrackers MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF 1C | 9.92% | 7.52% | 18.91% | 19.22% | -9.44% | 25.15% | 10.98% | 26.01% | -2.33% | 12.55% |
IWDA.AS iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 10.40% | 12.81% | 21.44% | 17.50% | -9.07% | 24.68% | 12.21% | 22.23% | -3.21% | 12.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDEQ.L and IWDA.AS is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2014 | 0.89 |
The correlation between XDEQ.L and IWDA.AS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDEQ.L vs. IWDA.AS — Risk / Return Rank
XDEQ.L
IWDA.AS
XDEQ.L vs. IWDA.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEQ.L) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWDA.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XDEQ.L | IWDA.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.45 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.40 | 4.06 | -0.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.23 | 15.56 | -1.33 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XDEQ.L vs. IWDA.AS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDEQ.L drawdown since its inception was -44.31%, which is greater than IWDA.AS's maximum drawdown of -26.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDEQ.L and IWDA.AS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDEQ.L | IWDA.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.31% | -26.21% | -18.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.90% | -6.46% | -0.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.24% | -19.59% | -0.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.24% | -19.59% | -0.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -24.31% | -26.21% | +1.90% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.03% | +0.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.43% | -3.61% | -8.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.65% | 1.69% | -0.04% |
Volatility
XDEQ.L vs. IWDA.AS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEQ.L) is 2.65%, while iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWDA.AS) has a volatility of 3.08%. This indicates that XDEQ.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWDA.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDEQ.L | IWDA.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.65% | 3.08% | -0.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.31% | 7.86% | -0.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.90% | 10.72% | -0.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.18% | 13.71% | +5.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.54% | 14.85% | +5.69% |
XDEQ.L vs. IWDA.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDEQ.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than IWDA.AS's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XDEQ.L vs. IWDA.AS - Dividend Comparison
Neither XDEQ.L nor IWDA.AS has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XDEQ.L and IWDA.AS have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IWDA.AS is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IWDA.AS is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XDEQ.L.
XDEQ.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while IWDA.AS tracks MSCI World Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XDEQ.L and 0.20% for IWDA.AS.
Find the right allocation for XDEQ.L and IWDA.AS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer