XDEQ.DE vs. AH50.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XDEQ.DE (Xtrackers MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF 1C) and AH50.DE (Xtrackers Harvest FTSE China A-H 50 UCITS ETF 1D) are both exchange-traded funds - XDEQ.DE is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD, while AH50.DE is a China Equities fund tracking the MSCI China NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XDEQ.DE returned 12.38%/yr vs 8.17%/yr for AH50.DE. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XDEQ.DE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for AH50.DE.

Performance

XDEQ.DE vs. AH50.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEQ.DE) and Xtrackers Harvest FTSE China A-H 50 UCITS ETF 1D (AH50.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDEQ.DE achieves a 9.48% return, which is significantly lower than AH50.DE's 13.38% return. Over the past 10 years, XDEQ.DE has outperformed AH50.DE with an annualized return of 12.38%, while AH50.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 8.17% annualized return.

XDEQ.DE

• 1D: 0.79%
• 1M: 3.10%
• YTD: 9.48%
• 6M: 9.63%
• 1Y: 19.01%
• 3Y*: 15.18%
• 5Y*: 11.42%
• 10Y*: 12.38%

AH50.DE

• 1D: -0.52%
• 1M: 0.48%
• YTD: 13.38%
• 6M: 16.15%
• 1Y: 31.49%
• 3Y*: 12.81%
• 5Y*: 1.06%
• 10Y*: 8.17%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDEQ.DE vs. AH50.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
XDEQ.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF 1C	9.48%	2.87%	23.81%	21.83%	-14.94%	34.64%	4.47%	34.18%	-3.32%	7.04%
AH50.DE Xtrackers Harvest FTSE China A-H 50 UCITS ETF 1D	13.38%	11.41%	26.06%	-15.94%	-16.05%	2.97%	14.92%	41.09%	-16.54%	20.91%

Correlation

The correlation between XDEQ.DE and AH50.DE is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.36
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.26
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.27
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.39
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2016	0.39

The correlation between XDEQ.DE and AH50.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (3 years) to 0.39 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

XDEQ.DE vs. AH50.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDEQ.DE

XDEQ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 58
XDEQ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
XDEQ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
XDEQ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 55
XDEQ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
XDEQ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 67

AH50.DE

AH50.DE Risk / Return Rank: 62
AH50.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
AH50.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
AH50.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 53
AH50.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
AH50.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDEQ.DE vs. AH50.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEQ.DE) and Xtrackers Harvest FTSE China A-H 50 UCITS ETF 1D (AH50.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XDEQ.DE	AH50.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.78	1.83	-0.05
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.56	2.42	+0.14
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.32	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.04	4.40	-1.36
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.17	12.99	-0.81
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XDEQ.DE vs. AH50.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDEQ.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.78, which is comparable to the AH50.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDEQ.DE and AH50.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XDEQ.DE	AH50.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.78	1.83	-0.05
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.80	0.05	+0.75
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.85	0.36	+0.50
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.80	0.35	+0.45

Drawdowns

XDEQ.DE vs. AH50.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDEQ.DE drawdown since its inception was -32.16%, smaller than the maximum AH50.DE drawdown of -45.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDEQ.DE and AH50.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	XDEQ.DE	AH50.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.16%	-45.20%	+13.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.22%	-7.15%	+0.93%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.59%	-25.16%	+4.57%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.59%	-38.11%	+17.52%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.16%	-45.20%	+13.04%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-5.93%	+5.93%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.75%	-16.78%	+12.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.56%	2.43%	-0.87%

Volatility

XDEQ.DE vs. AH50.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEQ.DE) is 2.36%, while Xtrackers Harvest FTSE China A-H 50 UCITS ETF 1D (AH50.DE) has a volatility of 5.94%. This indicates that XDEQ.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AH50.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XDEQ.DE	AH50.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.36%	5.94%	-3.58%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.32%	12.32%	-5.00%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.64%	17.18%	-6.54%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.12%	23.21%	-9.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.35%	22.82%	-7.47%

XDEQ.DE vs. AH50.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDEQ.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than AH50.DE's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

XDEQ.DE vs. AH50.DE - Dividend Comparison

XDEQ.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AH50.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.07%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AH50.DE Xtrackers Harvest FTSE China A-H 50 UCITS ETF 1D	2.07%	3.00%	2.24%	2.80%	3.06%	1.67%	1.80%	1.65%	2.56%	2.44%
XDEQ.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF 1C	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XDEQ.DE and AH50.DE in my portfolio?

XDEQ.DE and AH50.DE have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XDEQ.DE or AH50.DE?

On fees, XDEQ.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XDEQ.DE or AH50.DE?

XDEQ.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for AH50.DE.

What is the main difference between XDEQ.DE and AH50.DE?

XDEQ.DE is categorized as Global Equities, while AH50.DE is China Equities. XDEQ.DE tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while AH50.DE tracks MSCI China NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XDEQ.DE and 0.65% for AH50.DE.