PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDEP.DE vs. AAAU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDEP.DE vs. AAAU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers iBoxx EUR Corporate Bond Yield Plus UCITS ETF (XDEP.DE) and Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XDEP.DE is traded in EUR, while AAAU is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the AAAU values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDEP.DE achieves a 0.60% return, which is significantly lower than AAAU's 5.01% return.


XDEP.DE

1D
0.09%
1M
0.22%
YTD
0.60%
6M
0.55%
1Y
2.53%
3Y*
5.50%
5Y*
0.29%
10Y*

AAAU

1D
0.00%
1M
-3.44%
YTD
5.01%
6M
6.77%
1Y
31.32%
3Y*
27.85%
5Y*
19.70%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDEP.DE vs. AAAU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
XDEP.DE
Xtrackers iBoxx EUR Corporate Bond Yield Plus UCITS ETF
0.60%3.58%5.25%9.38%-15.31%-0.31%2.90%8.79%-1.89%
AAAU
Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF
2.01%44.59%35.29%9.58%5.67%3.17%14.71%20.84%8.07%

Correlation

The correlation between XDEP.DE and AAAU is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 16, 2018

0.14

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDEP.DE vs. AAAU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDEP.DE
XDEP.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
XDEP.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDEP.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDEP.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
XDEP.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDEP.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

AAAU
AAAU Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
AAAU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAAU Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAAU Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
AAAU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAAU Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDEP.DE vs. AAAU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers iBoxx EUR Corporate Bond Yield Plus UCITS ETF (XDEP.DE) and Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XDEP.DEAAAUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.26

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.70

1.84

-1.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.39

4.36

-1.97

XDEP.DE vs. AAAU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDEP.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.65, which is lower than the AAAU Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDEP.DE and AAAU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XDEP.DEAAAUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

1.26

-0.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

1.19

-1.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

1.15

-0.85

Drawdowns

XDEP.DE vs. AAAU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDEP.DE drawdown since its inception was -19.79%, which is greater than AAAU's maximum drawdown of -18.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDEP.DE and AAAU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDEP.DEAAAUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.79%

-18.54%

-1.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.22%

-17.11%

+13.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.22%

-17.11%

+13.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.79%

-17.11%

-2.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.90%

-15.47%

+14.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.48%

-5.27%

+0.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.95%

7.21%

-6.26%

Volatility

XDEP.DE vs. AAAU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers iBoxx EUR Corporate Bond Yield Plus UCITS ETF (XDEP.DE) is 1.21%, while Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU) has a volatility of 3.74%. This indicates that XDEP.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AAAU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDEP.DEAAAUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.21%

3.74%

-2.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.13%

21.58%

-18.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.47%

24.92%

-21.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.72%

16.56%

-11.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.28%

15.81%

-10.53%

XDEP.DE vs. AAAU - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDEP.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than AAAU's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XDEP.DE vs. AAAU - Dividend Comparison

XDEP.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.88%, while AAAU has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
AAAU
Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XDEP.DE
Xtrackers iBoxx EUR Corporate Bond Yield Plus UCITS ETF
2.88%2.73%2.26%1.68%2.51%1.53%1.85%1.40%0.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


XDEP.DE and AAAU have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AAAU is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AAAU is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XDEP.DE.

XDEP.DE is categorized as European Corporate Bonds, while AAAU is Gold. XDEP.DE tracks iBoxx® EUR Corporates Yield Plus, while AAAU tracks LBMA Gold PM Price. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XDEP.DE and 0.18% for AAAU.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDEP.DE and AAAU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer