XDEM.L vs. XBCU.L

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

XDEM.L (Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C) and XBCU.L (Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity ex-Agriculture & Livestock Swap UCITS ETF 2C) are both exchange-traded funds - XDEM.L is a Momentum fund tracking the MSCI World Momentum Index, while XBCU.L is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg ex-Agriculture and Livestock 15/30 Capped 3 Month Forward. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XDEM.L returned 17.01%/yr vs 11.01%/yr for XBCU.L. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XDEM.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for XBCU.L.

Performance

XDEM.L vs. XBCU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEM.L) and Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity ex-Agriculture & Livestock Swap UCITS ETF 2C (XBCU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

XDEM.L is traded in GBp, while XBCU.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XBCU.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with XDEM.L having a 23.18% return and XBCU.L slightly higher at 24.21%. Over the past 10 years, XDEM.L has outperformed XBCU.L with an annualized return of 17.01%, while XBCU.L has yielded a comparatively lower 11.01% annualized return.

XDEM.L

• 1D: 1.40%
• 1M: 11.96%
• YTD: 23.18%
• 6M: 24.68%
• 1Y: 36.45%
• 3Y*: 26.71%
• 5Y*: 15.08%
• 10Y*: 17.01%

XBCU.L

• 1D: 0.27%
• 1M: 3.15%
• YTD: 24.21%
• 6M: 25.77%
• 1Y: 47.34%
• 3Y*: 16.92%
• 5Y*: 16.91%
• 10Y*: 11.01%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDEM.L vs. XBCU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
XDEM.L Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C	23.18%	12.52%	32.87%	5.88%	-8.06%	15.61%	24.14%	23.37%	2.28%	20.40%
XBCU.L Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity ex-Agriculture & Livestock Swap UCITS ETF 2C	24.21%	17.11%	10.54%	-14.47%	35.34%	40.95%	-4.23%	3.45%	-6.04%	-3.80%

Correlation

The correlation between XDEM.L and XBCU.L is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.01
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.11
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.20
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.28
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2014	0.30

The correlation between XDEM.L and XBCU.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.30 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XDEM.L vs. XBCU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XDEM.L	XBCU.L
Technology	34.6%	41.0%
Industrials	20.5%	9.4%
Financial Services	18.9%	4.2%
Communication Services	7.2%	16.1%
Healthcare	6.0%	6.1%
Basic Materials	4.9%	1.4%
Utilities	2.6%	1.1%
Energy	1.8%	3.4%
Consumer Defensive	1.2%	9.9%
Consumer Cyclical	1.2%	5.1%
Real Estate	1.0%	3.4%

Return for Risk

XDEM.L vs. XBCU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDEM.L

XDEM.L Risk / Return Rank: 73
XDEM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
XDEM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
XDEM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 67
XDEM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
XDEM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 79

XBCU.L

XBCU.L Risk / Return Rank: 77
XBCU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
XBCU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
XBCU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 78
XBCU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
XBCU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDEM.L vs. XBCU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEM.L) and Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity ex-Agriculture & Livestock Swap UCITS ETF 2C (XBCU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XDEM.L	XBCU.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.25	2.55	-0.30
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.31	3.08	+0.23
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.46	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.03	5.91	-1.89
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.69	14.55	+1.15
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XDEM.L vs. XBCU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDEM.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.25, which is comparable to the XBCU.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDEM.L and XBCU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XDEM.L	XBCU.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.25	2.55	-0.30
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.92	0.93	-0.01
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	1.01	0.64	+0.37
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.97	0.31	+0.66

Drawdowns

XDEM.L vs. XBCU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDEM.L drawdown since its inception was -22.42%, smaller than the maximum XBCU.L drawdown of -52.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDEM.L and XBCU.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	XDEM.L	XBCU.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.42%	-52.27%	+29.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.01%	-7.97%	-1.04%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.99%	-15.39%	-4.60%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.13%	-27.98%	+7.85%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-22.42%	-31.79%	+9.37%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.50%	+1.50%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.99%	-24.35%	+19.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.32%	3.25%	-0.93%

Volatility

XDEM.L vs. XBCU.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEM.L) has a higher volatility of 5.92% compared to Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity ex-Agriculture & Livestock Swap UCITS ETF 2C (XBCU.L) at 4.41%. This indicates that XDEM.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XBCU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XDEM.L	XBCU.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.92%	4.41%	+1.51%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.77%	15.31%	-1.54%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.16%	18.49%	-2.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.41%	18.16%	-1.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.80%	17.19%	-0.39%

XDEM.L vs. XBCU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDEM.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than XBCU.L's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

XDEM.L vs. XBCU.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XDEM.L nor XBCU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XDEM.L and XBCU.L in my portfolio?

XDEM.L and XBCU.L have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XDEM.L or XBCU.L?

On fees, XDEM.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XDEM.L or XBCU.L?

XDEM.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for XBCU.L.

What is the main difference between XDEM.L and XBCU.L?

XDEM.L is categorized as Momentum, while XBCU.L is Commodities. XDEM.L tracks MSCI World Momentum Index, while XBCU.L tracks Bloomberg ex-Agriculture and Livestock 15/30 Capped 3 Month Forward. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XDEM.L and 0.29% for XBCU.L.