XDEM.L vs. POWWP
XDEM.L (Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C) is Momentum fund tracking the MSCI World Momentum Index, while POWWP (AMMO, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, XDEM.L returned 15.08%/yr vs 8.57%/yr for POWWP. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
XDEM.L vs. POWWP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XDEM.L is traded in GBp, while POWWP is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the POWWP values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XDEM.L achieves a 23.18% return, which is significantly higher than POWWP's 5.86% return.
XDEM.L
- 1D
- 1.40%
- 1M
- 11.96%
- YTD
- 23.18%
- 6M
- 24.68%
- 1Y
- 36.45%
- 3Y*
- 26.71%
- 5Y*
- 15.08%
- 10Y*
- 17.01%
POWWP
- 1D
- -0.99%
- 1M
- -0.42%
- YTD
- 5.86%
- 6M
- 3.39%
- 1Y
- 17.53%
- 3Y*
- 5.61%
- 5Y*
- 8.57%
- 10Y*
- —
XDEM.L vs. POWWP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDEM.L Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C | 23.18% | 12.52% | 32.87% | 5.88% | -8.06% | 15.67% |
POWWP AMMO, Inc. | 5.86% | 24.14% | -14.05% | 4.55% | 10.43% | 19.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDEM.L and POWWP is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 24, 2021 | 0.07 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDEM.L vs. POWWP — Risk / Return Rank
XDEM.L
POWWP
XDEM.L vs. POWWP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEM.L) and AMMO, Inc. (POWWP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XDEM.L | POWWP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.92 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.20 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.03 | 1.99 | +2.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.69 | 6.51 | +9.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XDEM.L | POWWP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.25 | 0.97 | +1.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 | 0.33 | +0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.01 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.97 | 0.35 | +0.62 |
Drawdowns
XDEM.L vs. POWWP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDEM.L drawdown since its inception was -22.42%, smaller than the maximum POWWP drawdown of -32.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDEM.L and POWWP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDEM.L | POWWP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.42% | -32.35% | +9.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.01% | -8.87% | -0.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.99% | -32.35% | +12.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.13% | -32.35% | +12.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.42% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -3.00% | +3.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.99% | -7.51% | +2.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.32% | 2.70% | -0.38% |
Volatility
XDEM.L vs. POWWP - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEM.L) has a higher volatility of 5.92% compared to AMMO, Inc. (POWWP) at 2.67%. This indicates that XDEM.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than POWWP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDEM.L | POWWP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.92% | 2.67% | +3.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.77% | 8.04% | +5.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.16% | 18.32% | -2.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.41% | 26.32% | -9.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.80% | 26.32% | -9.52% |
Dividends
XDEM.L vs. POWWP - Dividend Comparison
XDEM.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while POWWP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.10%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
POWWP AMMO, Inc. | 9.10% | 9.17% | 11.38% | 8.73% | 8.80% | 4.53% |
XDEM.L Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XDEM.L and POWWP have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for XDEM.L and POWWP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer