POWWP vs. POWW
POWWP (AMMO, Inc.) and POWW (AMMO, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Aerospace & Defense industry within the Industrials sector. Over the past 5 years, POWWP returned 7.42%/yr vs -21.02%/yr for POWW. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
POWWP vs. POWW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, POWWP achieves a 5.46% return, which is significantly lower than POWW's 17.54% return.
POWWP
- 1D
- -1.25%
- 1M
- -1.22%
- YTD
- 5.46%
- 6M
- 3.94%
- 1Y
- 16.72%
- 3Y*
- 8.29%
- 5Y*
- 7.42%
- 10Y*
- —
POWW
- 1D
- -2.43%
- 1M
- -1.47%
- YTD
- 17.54%
- 6M
- 4.69%
- 1Y
- 47.79%
- 3Y*
- 1.89%
- 5Y*
- -21.02%
- 10Y*
- 44.40%
POWWP vs. POWW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
POWWP AMMO, Inc. | 5.46% | 33.67% | -15.52% | 10.05% | -1.30% | 13.90% |
POWW AMMO, Inc. | 17.54% | 55.45% | -47.62% | 21.39% | -68.26% | -14.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between POWWP and POWW is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 24, 2021 | 0.09 |
Fundamentals
POWWP:
$2.96B
POWW:
$246.99M
POWWP:
-$0.68
POWW:
-$0.68
POWWP:
12.46
POWW:
1.04
POWWP:
-$4.92M
POWW:
-$4.92M
POWWP:
$50.58M
POWW:
$50.58M
POWWP:
$2.47M
POWW:
$2.47M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
POWWP vs. POWW — Risk / Return Rank
POWWP
POWW
POWWP vs. POWW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AMMO, Inc. (POWWP) and AMMO, Inc. (POWW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| POWWP | POWW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.19 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.38 | 1.67 | +0.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.74 | 4.33 | +4.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| POWWP | POWW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.02 | 0.97 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 | -0.37 | +0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.02 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | 0.02 | +0.30 |
Drawdowns
POWWP vs. POWW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum POWWP drawdown since its inception was -31.45%, smaller than the maximum POWW drawdown of -90.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for POWWP and POWW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| POWWP | POWW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.45% | -90.01% | +58.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.06% | -28.76% | +21.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.45% | -67.62% | +36.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.45% | -90.01% | +58.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -90.01% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.62% | -79.47% | +77.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.77% | -58.44% | +52.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.92% | 11.06% | -9.14% |
Volatility
POWWP vs. POWW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AMMO, Inc. (POWWP) is 2.09%, while AMMO, Inc. (POWW) has a volatility of 9.10%. This indicates that POWWP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than POWW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| POWWP | POWW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.09% | 9.10% | -7.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.23% | 28.87% | -22.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.57% | 49.74% | -33.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.30% | 57.67% | -32.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.31% | 2,520.34% | -2,495.03% |
Dividends
POWWP vs. POWW - Dividend Comparison
POWWP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.10%, while POWW has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
POWW AMMO, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
POWWP AMMO, Inc. | 9.10% | 9.17% | 11.38% | 8.73% | 8.80% | 4.53% |
Financials
POWWP vs. POWW - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between AMMO, Inc. and AMMO, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
POWWP vs. POWW - Profitability Comparison
POWWP - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AMMO, Inc. reported a gross profit of 11.66M and revenue of 13.39M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 87.1%.
POWW - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AMMO, Inc. reported a gross profit of 11.66M and revenue of 13.39M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 87.1%.
POWWP - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AMMO, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.97M and revenue of 13.39M, resulting in an operating margin of 14.7%.
POWW - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AMMO, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.97M and revenue of 13.39M, resulting in an operating margin of 14.7%.
POWWP - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AMMO, Inc. reported a net income of 1.46M and revenue of 13.39M, resulting in a net margin of 10.9%.
POWW - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AMMO, Inc. reported a net income of 1.46M and revenue of 13.39M, resulting in a net margin of 10.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
POWWP and POWW have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
POWW has higher volatility (9.10%) compared to POWWP (2.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, POWWP dropped -31.45% vs POWW's -90.01%.
POWWP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.02 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for POWWP and POWW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer